Course record STAT
STAT 4520
Introduction to Mathematical Statistics
University of Colorado Boulder
265 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs workJem Corcoran 44 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
44 letter grades
Compare with the course
Corcoran vs. the course average
A
+13.0
B
−0.3
C
−2.6
D
−6.0
F
−4.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 44 enrolled.
Overall4.71 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.15
Contribution4.65
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Brian R Zaharatos 121 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
121 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zaharatos vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
+2.4
C
−3.8
D
−1.9
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
6.9% withdrew · 9 of 130 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.84
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.26
Connection3.80
Contribution4.69
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.07
Grading4.61
Reflection4.51
Respect4.84
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.14
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.74
Questions4.97
Judith Law 53 grades · 1 term 2.65GPA
53 letter grades
Compare with the course
Law vs. the course average
A
−9.4
B
−1.5
C
+10.2
D
−4.2
F
+4.9
Difference in percentage points.
8.6% withdrew · 5 of 58 enrolled.
Overall3.68 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence2.76
Technology4.16
Synthesis3.04
Collaboration1.61
Connection2.70
Contribution2.74
Discussion3.24
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.67
Reflection3.12
Respect4.29
Creativity3.88
Feedback3.13
Interaction2.06
Challenge3.56
Questions4.88
Manuel Bosco Lladser 47 grades · 1 term 2.35GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lladser vs. the course average
A
−16.0
B
−4.3
C
+0.8
D
+15.2
F
+4.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.0% withdrew · 3 of 50 enrolled.
Overall4.12 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration2.97
Connection3.86
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.04
Grading4.18
Reflection4.52
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.79
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.79
Questions4.69
Kyle Luh 11 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Janos Englander 16 reported responses 2.85Eval / 5
Overall2.85 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology3.11
Synthesis3.61
Collaboration1.76
Connection2.91
Contribution2.55
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity1.15
Grading3.16
Reflection2.91
Respect4.27
Creativity2.72
Feedback3.09
Interaction2.80
Challenge4.06
Questions3.90
Xingzhou Yang 6 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.89
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.78
Reflection4.89
Respect5.00
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.89
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.99
Albert Bronstein 9 reported responses 3.37Eval / 5
Overall3.37 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.12
Technology1.65
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration2.05
Connection1.86
Contribution3.04
Discussion2.70
Inclusivity3.92
Grading3.04
Reflection2.66
Respect3.28
Creativity2.24
Feedback1.70
Interaction3.92
Challenge2.28
Questions3.04
Eric Paul Gilleland 2 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Sean Svihla 23 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.85
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.35
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.45
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.