Course record STAT

STAT 4520

Introduction to Mathematical Statistics

University of Colorado Boulder

265 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 10

Jem Corcoran 44 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
54.5% A
29.5% B
13.6% C
0.0% D
2.3% F

44 letter grades

Compare with the course
Corcoran vs. the course average
A +13.0
B −0.3
C −2.6
D −6.0
F −4.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 44 enrolled.

Brian R Zaharatos 121 grades · 1 term 3.07GPA
47.1% A
32.2% B
12.4% C
4.1% D
4.1% F

121 letter grades

Compare with the course
Zaharatos vs. the course average
A +5.6
B +2.4
C −3.8
D −1.9
F −2.3

Difference in percentage points.

6.9% withdrew · 9 of 130 enrolled.

Judith Law 53 grades · 1 term 2.65GPA
32.1% A
28.3% B
26.4% C
1.9% D
11.3% F

53 letter grades

Compare with the course
Law vs. the course average
A −9.4
B −1.5
C +10.2
D −4.2
F +4.9

Difference in percentage points.

8.6% withdrew · 5 of 58 enrolled.

Manuel Bosco Lladser 47 grades · 1 term 2.35GPA
25.5% A
25.5% B
17.0% C
21.3% D
10.6% F

47 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lladser vs. the course average
A −16.0
B −4.3
C +0.8
D +15.2
F +4.2

Difference in percentage points.

6.0% withdrew · 3 of 50 enrolled.

Kyle Luh 11 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.50
Connection4.10
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Janos Englander 16 reported responses 2.85Eval / 5
Overall2.85 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.82
Technology3.11
Synthesis3.61
Collaboration1.76
Connection2.91
Contribution2.55
Discussion3.60
Inclusivity1.15
Grading3.16
Reflection2.91
Respect4.27
Creativity2.72
Feedback3.09
Interaction2.80
Challenge4.06
Questions3.90
Xingzhou Yang 6 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.89
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.78
Reflection4.89
Respect5.00
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.89
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.99
Albert Bronstein 9 reported responses 3.37Eval / 5
Overall3.37 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.12
Technology1.65
Synthesis2.70
Collaboration2.05
Connection1.86
Contribution3.04
Discussion2.70
Inclusivity3.92
Grading3.04
Reflection2.66
Respect3.28
Creativity2.24
Feedback1.70
Interaction3.92
Challenge2.28
Questions3.04
Eric Paul Gilleland 2 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity3.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.50
Sean Svihla 23 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration3.10
Connection3.85
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.35
Reflection4.50
Respect4.75
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.45
Questions4.70
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.