Course record STAT
STAT 2600
Introduction to Data Science
University of Colorado Boulder
369 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score29/100
Below average
Maziar Raissi 71 grades · 1 term 3.42GPA
71 letter grades
Compare with the course
Raissi vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−0.5
C
−11.8
D
+1.8
F
−3.7
Difference in percentage points.
6.6% withdrew · 5 of 76 enrolled.
Overall3.21 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.20
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration2.20
Connection3.70
Contribution2.90
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity2.30
Grading2.80
Reflection2.90
Respect3.80
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.10
Interaction3.40
Challenge3.30
Questions3.10
Stephen J Molinari 37 grades · 1 term 3.22GPA
37 letter grades
Compare with the course
Molinari vs. the course average
A
+5.0
B
−0.4
C
−2.5
D
−2.4
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
11.9% withdrew · 5 of 42 enrolled.
Overall3.67 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.40
Connection3.80
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity2.20
Grading3.30
Reflection3.70
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.70
Interaction3.50
Challenge3.90
Questions4.60
Osita Eluemuno Onyejekwe 102 grades · 1 term 3.21GPA
102 letter grades
Compare with the course
Onyejekwe vs. the course average
A
+8.6
B
−5.6
C
−1.3
D
−2.4
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
6.4% withdrew · 7 of 109 enrolled.
Overall3.86 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.02
Technology4.28
Synthesis3.66
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.40
Contribution4.04
Discussion4.11
Inclusivity3.76
Grading3.62
Reflection3.68
Respect4.63
Creativity3.96
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.01
Questions3.93
Kristopher Pruitt 159 grades · 1 term 2.81GPA
159 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pruitt vs. the course average
A
−13.0
B
+3.9
C
+6.7
D
+1.3
F
+1.1
Difference in percentage points.
6.5% withdrew · 11 of 170 enrolled.
Overall4.54 / 5
109 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.81
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.83
Reflection4.68
Respect4.84
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.68
Questions4.85
Kayvon Titian Coffey 23 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.94
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.78
Reflection4.95
Respect4.99
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.96
Questions4.97
Constance Delannoy 24 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.35
Contribution3.65
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.15
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.25
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.25
Questions4.55
Zackary Jensen 11 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.55
Connection3.85
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.35
Reflection4.15
Respect4.95
Creativity4.10
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.60
Questions4.40
Zach Sajevic 10 reported responses 4.07Eval / 5
Overall4.07 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.65
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration3.30
Connection3.80
Contribution3.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.05
Grading4.15
Reflection3.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.30
Questions4.40
Ellery Galvin 18 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.00
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity3.75
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.55
Challenge3.85
Questions4.30
Claudia Chen 15 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.24
Collaboration3.98
Connection3.89
Contribution3.95
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity3.69
Grading4.66
Reflection4.31
Respect4.79
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.42
Questions4.72
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.