Course record PHYS
PHYS 2600
Introduction to Programming and Scientific Computing
University of Colorado Boulder
356 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score25/100
Below average
Dennis Vadimovich Perepelitsa 101 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
101 letter grades
Compare with the course
Perepelitsa vs. the course average
A
+8.7
B
−2.1
C
−2.0
D
−3.5
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
5.6% withdrew · 6 of 107 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.70
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Scott E Parker 112 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
112 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parker vs. the course average
A
+3.3
B
+1.5
C
−2.2
D
+0.9
F
−3.5
Difference in percentage points.
5.9% withdrew · 7 of 119 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
55 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.29
Contribution3.66
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity3.10
Grading4.05
Reflection3.95
Respect4.45
Creativity4.14
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.32
Questions4.50
Ethan Neil 32 grades · 1 term 2.85GPA
32 letter grades
Compare with the course
Neil vs. the course average
A
−8.3
B
+4.6
C
+2.7
D
−1.4
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 32 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Kevin M Stenson 73 grades · 1 term 2.73GPA
73 letter grades
Compare with the course
Stenson vs. the course average
A
−11.5
B
+1.7
C
+6.3
D
−0.4
F
+3.9
Difference in percentage points.
6.4% withdrew · 5 of 78 enrolled.
Overall4.02 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.78
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration3.92
Connection4.52
Contribution3.74
Discussion4.38
Inclusivity3.91
Grading3.81
Reflection3.71
Respect4.48
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.38
Interaction3.82
Challenge4.18
Questions4.36
Meredith D Betterton 38 grades · 1 term 2.69GPA
38 letter grades
Compare with the course
Betterton vs. the course average
A
−3.7
B
−6.1
C
−2.4
D
+8.7
F
+3.5
Difference in percentage points.
7.3% withdrew · 3 of 41 enrolled.
Overall3.60 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.60
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.70
Connection3.70
Contribution2.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity2.50
Grading3.40
Reflection3.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.30
Feedback2.20
Interaction4.30
Challenge3.70
Questions4.40
Stefan Tirkas 9 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.50
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.60
Maeve Andersen 9 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect4.60
Creativity4.70
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.30
Questions4.10
Wilson Lough 9 reported responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.40
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.10
Challenge4.00
Questions4.60
Noah D Finkelstein 17 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.70
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Ivy Tan 17 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.