Course record PHIL
PHIL 3100
Ethical Theory
University of Colorado Boulder
450 grades12 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score52/100
Mixed record
Andrew David Chapman 41 grades · 1 term 3.93GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Chapman vs. the course average
A
+34.5
B
−19.6
C
−9.1
D
−2.7
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 41 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.20
Reflection4.60
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions3.60
Michael James Bevan 41 grades · 1 term 3.72GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bevan vs. the course average
A
+36.9
B
−26.9
C
−9.1
D
−2.7
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
2.4% withdrew · 1 of 42 enrolled.
Overall4.66 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Zak Alexander Kopeikin 136 grades · 1 term 3.55GPA
136 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kopeikin vs. the course average
A
+16.0
B
−10.7
C
−6.2
D
+1.7
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
3.5% withdrew · 5 of 141 enrolled.
Overall4.84 / 5
119 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.79
Collaboration4.45
Connection4.81
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.88
Reflection4.91
Respect4.91
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.88
Questions4.93
Derick Hughes 43 grades · 1 term 3.20GPA
43 letter grades
Compare with the course
Hughes vs. the course average
A
−7.1
B
−1.3
C
+9.5
D
−2.7
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 43 enrolled.
Overall4.74 / 5
53 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.75
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.72
Reflection4.78
Respect4.82
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Caleb Herman Perl 65 grades · 1 term 3.18GPA
65 letter grades
Compare with the course
Perl vs. the course average
A
−25.9
B
+23.9
C
+7.8
D
−2.7
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.0% withdrew · 2 of 67 enrolled.
Shane Bodhi Melnitzer 124 grades · 1 term 2.87GPA
124 letter grades
Compare with the course
Melnitzer vs. the course average
A
−25.2
B
+15.0
C
+5.4
D
+2.2
F
+2.5
Difference in percentage points.
4.6% withdrew · 6 of 130 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
142 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.68
Contribution4.69
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.41
Grading4.52
Reflection4.80
Respect4.74
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.68
Questions4.73
Evan Jaymes Frook 11 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.90
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Daniel Douglas Carr 18 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.90
Eric C Brown 14 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.05
Connection3.70
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.25
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.35
Creativity3.70
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.05
Questions4.35
James Marks 2 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration5.00
Connection3.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.