Course record MATH

MATH 4520

Introduction to Mathematical Statistics

University of Colorado Boulder

224 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score12/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 10

Kyle Luh 46 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
58.7% A
32.6% B
8.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

46 letter grades

Compare with the course
Luh vs. the course average
A +29.7
B −0.9
C −14.5
D −5.8
F −8.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 46 enrolled.

Albert Bronstein 83 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
30.1% A
30.1% B
33.7% C
1.2% D
4.8% F

83 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bronstein vs. the course average
A +1.1
B −3.4
C +10.5
D −4.6
F −3.7

Difference in percentage points.

5.7% withdrew · 5 of 88 enrolled.

Janos Englander 95 grades · 1 term 2.17GPA
13.7% A
36.8% B
21.1% C
12.6% D
15.8% F

95 letter grades

Compare with the course
Englander vs. the course average
A −15.3
B +3.4
C −2.2
D +6.8
F +7.3

Difference in percentage points.

11.2% withdrew · 12 of 107 enrolled.

Brian R Zaharatos 30 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration3.66
Connection3.67
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity2.46
Grading4.31
Reflection4.75
Respect4.89
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.54
Questions4.88
Xingzhou Yang 18 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

18 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.24
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.27
Connection4.88
Contribution4.91
Discussion4.22
Inclusivity4.79
Grading2.06
Reflection4.98
Respect4.88
Creativity4.76
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.29
Challenge4.22
Questions4.98
Judith Law 12 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.01
Technology4.19
Synthesis4.27
Collaboration1.92
Connection2.63
Contribution2.95
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity2.34
Grading3.06
Reflection4.01
Respect4.78
Creativity3.06
Feedback3.96
Interaction3.92
Challenge4.71
Questions4.49
Jem Corcoran 8 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.80
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.20
Connection3.70
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.30
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Manuel Bosco Lladser 21 reported responses 3.99Eval / 5
Overall3.99 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology3.96
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration2.69
Connection3.14
Contribution3.87
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity2.37
Grading3.42
Reflection4.35
Respect4.52
Creativity3.84
Feedback3.18
Interaction4.02
Challenge4.56
Questions4.22
Eric Paul Gilleland 5 reported responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology3.40
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.00
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading3.60
Reflection4.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.40
Sean Svihla 16 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration2.65
Connection3.10
Contribution3.85
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity2.25
Grading3.55
Reflection4.35
Respect4.40
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.00
Challenge3.80
Questions4.10
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.