Course record MATH
MATH 4510
Introduction to Probability Theory
University of Colorado Boulder
477 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score34/100
Below average
Jeffrey S Fox 35 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Fox vs. the course average
A
+50.1
B
−31.0
C
−12.6
D
−2.9
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
5.4% withdrew · 2 of 37 enrolled.
Overall2.72 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.15
Technology2.05
Synthesis3.10
Collaboration2.70
Connection2.70
Contribution2.60
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity3.60
Grading2.25
Reflection2.60
Respect3.85
Creativity2.45
Feedback1.65
Interaction3.60
Challenge2.75
Questions2.05
Nhan Du Vi Nguyen 26 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
26 letter grades
Compare with the course
Nguyen vs. the course average
A
+23.2
B
−8.0
C
−8.7
D
−2.9
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
3.7% withdrew · 1 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.94
Connection4.73
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.94
Reflection4.78
Respect4.93
Creativity4.69
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.84
Questions4.89
Kyle Luh 81 grades · 1 term 3.29GPA
81 letter grades
Compare with the course
Luh vs. the course average
A
+3.2
B
−1.4
C
+2.2
D
−2.9
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.7% withdrew · 4 of 85 enrolled.
Overall4.44 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.51
Contribution4.57
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.14
Grading3.95
Reflection4.43
Respect4.51
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.48
Challenge4.72
Questions4.71
Rodrigo Ribeiro 66 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
66 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ribeiro vs. the course average
A
+3.1
B
−2.2
C
−6.5
D
+4.6
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
2.9% withdrew · 2 of 68 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.81
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.78
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.75
Reflection4.74
Respect4.96
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Yining Zhang 97 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
97 letter grades
Compare with the course
Zhang vs. the course average
A
−13.8
B
+15.4
C
−0.2
D
−0.9
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 2 of 99 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.56
Technology4.18
Synthesis3.61
Collaboration3.16
Connection3.93
Contribution3.93
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.53
Reflection4.17
Respect4.78
Creativity4.06
Feedback3.91
Interaction4.03
Challenge4.22
Questions4.60
Sergei Eugenievitch Kuznetsov 107 grades · 1 term 3.08GPA
107 letter grades
Compare with the course
Kuznetsov vs. the course average
A
−3.2
B
−0.2
C
+2.4
D
+1.7
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
3.6% withdrew · 4 of 111 enrolled.
Overall4.29 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology3.81
Synthesis4.02
Collaboration2.68
Connection3.95
Contribution3.94
Discussion3.98
Inclusivity3.40
Grading4.14
Reflection3.95
Respect4.28
Creativity4.02
Feedback4.37
Interaction3.99
Challenge4.41
Questions4.24
Albert Bronstein 41 grades · 1 term 2.74GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bronstein vs. the course average
A
−18.2
B
+5.6
C
+4.5
D
−0.5
F
+8.6
Difference in percentage points.
6.8% withdrew · 3 of 44 enrolled.
Overall3.19 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.91
Technology1.31
Synthesis2.01
Collaboration1.36
Connection2.78
Contribution1.60
Discussion1.46
Inclusivity1.21
Grading2.30
Reflection2.11
Respect2.48
Creativity2.39
Feedback2.10
Interaction1.96
Challenge2.39
Questions2.23
Joseph Benjamin Timmer 24 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.78GPA
24 letter grades · Limited sample
11.1% withdrew · 3 of 27 enrolled.
Overall4.55 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.32
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.50
Contribution4.23
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity4.04
Grading4.77
Reflection4.54
Respect4.68
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.59
Challenge4.62
Questions4.81
Alexander Nita 3 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.70
Xingzhou Yang 2 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.50
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.