Course record LGBT
LGBT 2000
Introduction to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies
University of Colorado Boulder
440 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Abigail Grix 46 grades · 1 term 3.68GPA
46 letter grades
Compare with the course
Grix vs. the course average
A
+24.1
B
−5.9
C
−11.2
D
−3.6
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
6.1% withdrew · 3 of 49 enrolled.
Overall4.70 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.30
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Nathan Moore 141 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
141 letter grades
Compare with the course
Moore vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−5.7
C
−7.0
D
−2.9
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
2.8% withdrew · 4 of 145 enrolled.
Overall4.62 / 5
69 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.99
Connection4.97
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.92
Respect4.97
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.89
Questions4.70
Emmanuel A. David 45 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
45 letter grades
Compare with the course
David vs. the course average
A
+10.2
B
−0.9
C
−4.5
D
−1.4
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
4.3% withdrew · 2 of 47 enrolled.
Overall4.19 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.70
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.70
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity3.30
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.40
Emily Elizabeth Irvin 41 grades · 1 term 3.16GPA
41 letter grades
Compare with the course
Irvin vs. the course average
A
−13.2
B
+14.1
C
+1.2
D
+1.2
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
10.9% withdrew · 5 of 46 enrolled.
Overall4.48 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration4.23
Connection4.91
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.91
Grading4.55
Reflection4.79
Respect4.68
Creativity3.96
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.81
Questions4.19
Melissa Jo Painz 167 grades · 1 term 2.71GPA
167 letter grades
Compare with the course
Painz vs. the course average
A
−19.8
B
+3.2
C
+9.9
D
+3.5
F
+3.2
Difference in percentage points.
6.2% withdrew · 11 of 178 enrolled.
Overall3.99 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.85
Technology3.52
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration3.94
Connection4.76
Contribution3.76
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity4.46
Grading2.60
Reflection3.55
Respect4.11
Creativity3.58
Feedback3.23
Interaction4.51
Challenge3.62
Questions3.13
Amy Glen Bobeda 14 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.81
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.88
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.22
Reflection4.74
Respect4.92
Creativity4.58
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.76
Questions4.81
Jianmin Shao 24 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.78
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.93
Connection4.68
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.32
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.57
Questions4.80
Em Irvin 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.