Course record EDUC
EDUC 4023
Differentiating Instruction in Diverse Secondary Classrooms
University of Colorado Boulder
133 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score70/100
Strong
Andrea Marie Lemahieu Glaws 35 grades · 1 term 3.93GPA
35 letter grades
Compare with the course
Glaws vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−9.0
C
+2.1
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.92 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.89
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.99
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Kristina Marie Stamatis 22 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
22 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 22 enrolled.
Kimberly Ann Strong 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.87GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 10 enrolled.
Overall4.22 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.75
Contribution4.45
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.75
Grading3.55
Reflection4.35
Respect4.35
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.50
Questions4.40
Lydia Rose Sollenberger 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.86GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 23 enrolled.
Overall4.77 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.46
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.74
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.74
Grading4.84
Reflection4.82
Respect4.86
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.31
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.69
Questions4.85
Allarie Coleman 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.85GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
4.8% withdrew · 1 of 21 enrolled.
Overall4.13 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology4.11
Synthesis3.91
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.24
Contribution4.06
Discussion4.28
Inclusivity4.11
Grading3.28
Reflection3.96
Respect4.11
Creativity3.74
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.34
Challenge4.18
Questions4.18
Alison Gould Boardman 23 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.72GPA
23 letter grades · Limited sample
4.2% withdrew · 1 of 24 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.41
Technology4.30
Synthesis3.71
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.11
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.91
Grading3.01
Reflection3.81
Respect4.30
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.21
Challenge4.20
Questions4.31
Chelsea Desalvo 17 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.85
Connection5.00
Contribution4.82
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.63
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.63
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.91
Questions4.98
Chelsea Kent 16 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.90
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Sydnie Nagore 6 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.