Course record EBIO
EBIO 1010
Introduction to Statistics and Quantitative Thinking for Biologists
University of Colorado Boulder
581 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score49/100
Mixed recordLisa Corwin 280 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
280 letter grades
Compare with the course
Corwin vs. the course average
A
+4.9
B
−1.1
C
−3.1
D
−0.5
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 10 of 290 enrolled.
Overall4.72 / 5
97 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.78
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.79
Respect4.83
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.81
Challenge4.72
Questions4.86
Kendi F Davies 76 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
76 letter grades
Compare with the course
Davies vs. the course average
A
−3.8
B
+1.4
C
+1.8
D
+2.1
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
2.6% withdrew · 2 of 78 enrolled.
Andrew Martin 140 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
140 letter grades
Compare with the course
Martin vs. the course average
A
−6.6
B
+6.4
C
+0.8
D
−0.5
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 6 of 146 enrolled.
Overall4.56 / 5
252 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.47
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.73
Contribution4.56
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.45
Grading4.33
Reflection4.71
Respect4.88
Creativity4.84
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.86
Questions4.91
Elizabeth L Paulson 85 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
85 letter grades
Compare with the course
Paulson vs. the course average
A
−1.8
B
−8.3
C
+7.5
D
+0.7
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
3.4% withdrew · 3 of 88 enrolled.
Lisa Cutting Auchincloss 90 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Miranda Chen 91 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5
91 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.35
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.35
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Abbey Paulson 300 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5
300 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.31
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.48
Reflection4.48
Respect4.64
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.65
Questions4.69
Katie Bardsley 109 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
109 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.44
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.66
Reflection4.55
Respect4.83
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.61
Questions4.82
Gladiana Spitz 122 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
122 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.24
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.66
Grading4.40
Reflection4.52
Respect4.63
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.44
Questions4.68
Isabella Oleksy 34 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.