Course record EBIO

EBIO 1010

Introduction to Statistics and Quantitative Thinking for Biologists

University of Colorado Boulder

581 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score49/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 11

Lisa Corwin 280 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
67.9% A
22.5% B
8.2% C
0.0% D
1.4% F

280 letter grades

Compare with the course
Corwin vs. the course average
A +4.9
B −1.1
C −3.1
D −0.5
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 10 of 290 enrolled.

Kendi F Davies 76 grades · 1 term 3.39GPA
59.2% A
25.0% B
13.2% C
2.6% D
0.0% F

76 letter grades

Compare with the course
Davies vs. the course average
A −3.8
B +1.4
C +1.8
D +2.1
F −1.5

Difference in percentage points.

2.6% withdrew · 2 of 78 enrolled.

Andrew Martin 140 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
56.4% A
30.0% B
12.1% C
0.0% D
1.4% F

140 letter grades

Compare with the course
Martin vs. the course average
A −6.6
B +6.4
C +0.8
D −0.5
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

4.1% withdrew · 6 of 146 enrolled.

Elizabeth L Paulson 85 grades · 1 term 3.26GPA
61.2% A
15.3% B
18.8% C
1.2% D
3.5% F

85 letter grades

Compare with the course
Paulson vs. the course average
A −1.8
B −8.3
C +7.5
D +0.7
F +2.0

Difference in percentage points.

3.4% withdrew · 3 of 88 enrolled.

Lisa Cutting Auchincloss 90 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

90 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.40
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.60
Reflection4.60
Respect4.85
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Miranda Chen 91 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

91 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.25
Connection4.35
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity3.80
Grading4.35
Reflection4.60
Respect4.75
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.65
Questions4.75
Abbey Paulson 300 reported responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

300 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.31
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.63
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.48
Reflection4.48
Respect4.64
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.03
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.65
Questions4.69
Katie Bardsley 109 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5

109 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.79
Synthesis4.39
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.44
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.06
Grading4.66
Reflection4.55
Respect4.83
Creativity4.49
Feedback4.42
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.61
Questions4.82
Gladiana Spitz 122 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

122 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.26
Collaboration4.58
Connection4.24
Contribution4.22
Discussion4.44
Inclusivity3.66
Grading4.40
Reflection4.52
Respect4.63
Creativity4.11
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.74
Challenge4.44
Questions4.68
Isabella Oleksy 34 reported responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

34 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.30
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Show all 11 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.