Course record CSCI

CSCI 1200

Introduction to Computational Thinking

University of Colorado Boulder

689 grades26 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score20/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 26

James E Dykes 176 grades · 1 term 3.35GPA
67.0% A
18.2% B
5.7% C
3.4% D
5.7% F

176 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dykes vs. the course average
A +11.7
B −2.6
C −4.6
D −1.7
F −2.9

Difference in percentage points.

4.3% withdrew · 8 of 184 enrolled.

Sourav Chakraborty 165 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
66.1% A
17.6% B
3.6% C
1.8% D
10.9% F

165 letter grades

Compare with the course
Chakraborty vs. the course average
A +10.8
B −3.2
C −6.7
D −3.3
F +2.3

Difference in percentage points.

11.3% withdrew · 21 of 186 enrolled.

William Warren Wright 182 grades · 1 term 2.93GPA
41.2% A
29.7% B
15.9% C
8.2% D
4.9% F

182 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wright vs. the course average
A −14.1
B +8.9
C +5.6
D +3.2
F −3.6

Difference in percentage points.

10.3% withdrew · 21 of 203 enrolled.

David J Wooten 166 grades · 1 term 2.77GPA
47.6% A
16.9% B
15.7% C
6.6% D
13.3% F

166 letter grades

Compare with the course
Wooten vs. the course average
A −7.7
B −3.9
C +5.4
D +1.5
F +4.7

Difference in percentage points.

12.2% withdrew · 23 of 189 enrolled.

Aditi Prakash 21 reported responses 4.00Eval / 5
Overall4.00 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.23
Synthesis3.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.47
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.57
Grading3.63
Reflection4.03
Respect4.63
Creativity3.93
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.53
Challenge3.73
Questions4.40
Siddartha Shankar 64 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

64 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.20
Connection3.88
Contribution4.45
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.67
Grading4.28
Reflection4.47
Respect4.85
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.52
Challenge4.65
Questions4.63
Daniel Torres 28 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.65
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.55
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.10
Reflection4.25
Respect4.65
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.10
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.50
Questions4.45
Chinmay Agrawal 8 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading3.70
Reflection4.40
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback3.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.10
Questions4.60
Tavishi Priyam 25 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

25 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection3.70
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity3.35
Grading4.25
Reflection4.40
Respect4.35
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.45
Questions4.45
Jim Dykes 141 reported responses 3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5

141 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration3.28
Connection3.77
Contribution3.54
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity3.15
Grading4.28
Reflection3.84
Respect4.61
Creativity4.28
Feedback3.32
Interaction3.98
Challenge4.06
Questions4.35
Show all 26 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.