Course record COMM

COMM 3300

Rhetorical Thinking

University of Colorado Boulder

520 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 15

Jeffrey Brian Motter 163 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
48.5% A
37.4% B
12.3% C
1.2% D
0.6% F

163 letter grades

Compare with the course
Motter vs. the course average
A +19.0
B −8.2
C −10.2
D −0.7
F same

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 3 of 166 enrolled.

Marc H Rich 118 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
27.1% A
50.0% B
19.5% C
3.4% D
0.0% F

118 letter grades

Compare with the course
Rich vs. the course average
A −2.3
B +4.4
C −3.0
D +1.5
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.8% withdrew · 1 of 119 enrolled.

Omedi Ochieng 219 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
16.9% A
49.8% B
31.1% C
1.8% D
0.5% F

219 letter grades

Compare with the course
Ochieng vs. the course average
A −12.5
B +4.2
C +8.6
D −0.1
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 5 of 224 enrolled.

Michael Warren Cook 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.76GPA
25.0% A
40.0% B
30.0% C
0.0% D
5.0% F

20 letter grades · Limited sample

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.

Mikayla Torres 61 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

61 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.95
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.92
Reflection4.96
Respect4.96
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.86
Questions4.89
Bernardita Maria Yunis 13 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Audra Kelly Barber 15 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.75
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.15
Reflection3.75
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.25
Questions4.20
Warren Cook 28 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology3.57
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.42
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.13
Reflection4.61
Respect4.91
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.90
Questions4.45
Brandon Daniels 5 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Dustin J Martinez 6 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Show all 15 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.