Course record COMM
COMM 3300
Rhetorical Thinking
University of Colorado Boulder
520 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score20/100
Below average
Jeffrey Brian Motter 163 grades · 1 term 3.30GPA
163 letter grades
Compare with the course
Motter vs. the course average
A
+19.0
B
−8.2
C
−10.2
D
−0.7
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
1.8% withdrew · 3 of 166 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
74 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.34
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.36
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.36
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.35
Reflection4.52
Respect4.70
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.60
Questions4.37
Marc H Rich 118 grades · 1 term 2.99GPA
118 letter grades
Compare with the course
Rich vs. the course average
A
−2.3
B
+4.4
C
−3.0
D
+1.5
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.8% withdrew · 1 of 119 enrolled.
Overall3.54 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.73
Technology3.36
Synthesis3.61
Collaboration4.04
Connection3.59
Contribution3.35
Discussion3.55
Inclusivity3.63
Grading2.37
Reflection3.41
Respect3.91
Creativity3.25
Feedback2.15
Interaction4.01
Challenge3.37
Questions2.62
Omedi Ochieng 219 grades · 1 term 2.83GPA
219 letter grades
Compare with the course
Ochieng vs. the course average
A
−12.5
B
+4.2
C
+8.6
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
2.2% withdrew · 5 of 224 enrolled.
Overall3.61 / 5
149 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology3.53
Synthesis3.95
Collaboration4.12
Connection4.10
Contribution3.78
Discussion3.89
Inclusivity4.48
Grading2.75
Reflection3.96
Respect3.90
Creativity3.90
Feedback2.87
Interaction4.06
Challenge3.93
Questions3.65
Michael Warren Cook 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 2.76GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Mikayla Torres 61 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
61 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.96
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.95
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.99
Grading4.92
Reflection4.96
Respect4.96
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.86
Questions4.89
Bernardita Maria Yunis 13 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.50
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Audra Kelly Barber 15 reported responses 4.04Eval / 5
Overall4.04 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology3.85
Synthesis3.75
Collaboration3.05
Connection3.75
Contribution3.90
Discussion3.65
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.15
Reflection3.75
Respect4.65
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.25
Questions4.20
Warren Cook 28 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.62
Technology3.57
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.62
Connection4.42
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity4.53
Grading4.13
Reflection4.61
Respect4.91
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.90
Questions4.45
Brandon Daniels 5 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Dustin J Martinez 6 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.70
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Cara Wilson 54 reported responses 3.42Eval / 5
Overall3.42 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.47
Technology3.21
Synthesis3.39
Collaboration3.52
Connection3.61
Contribution3.60
Discussion3.73
Inclusivity3.85
Grading2.74
Reflection3.58
Respect4.17
Creativity2.88
Feedback2.52
Interaction4.12
Challenge3.22
Questions3.44
Tajshen Geneva Campbell 9 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.90
Connection4.00
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.70
Reflection4.30
Respect4.10
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.20
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.20
Questions3.80
Jose Guadalupe Izaguirre 66 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
66 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.36
Technology4.84
Synthesis3.35
Collaboration3.39
Connection3.35
Contribution3.33
Discussion4.86
Inclusivity3.36
Grading4.65
Reflection3.38
Respect4.84
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.65
Interaction3.38
Challenge4.81
Questions4.81
Millicent Elewosi 54 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.16
Connection4.20
Contribution3.91
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.83
Reflection4.25
Respect4.20
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.04
Challenge4.13
Questions4.18
Vera Smith 42 reported responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.05
Technology4.10
Synthesis3.88
Collaboration4.14
Connection4.08
Contribution3.75
Discussion3.99
Inclusivity4.51
Grading3.58
Reflection3.85
Respect4.37
Creativity3.95
Feedback3.75
Interaction4.03
Challenge3.94
Questions4.28
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.