Course record CMCI

CMCI 2030

Becoming CMCI: Thinking Across Disciplines

University of Colorado Boulder

289 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 13

Kevin James Sweet 38 grades · 1 term 3.76GPA
86.8% A
7.9% B
5.3% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

38 letter grades

Compare with the course
Sweet vs. the course average
A +18.0
B −11.8
C −2.0
D −1.4
F −2.8

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 38 enrolled.

Samira Rajabi 134 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
71.6% A
19.4% B
6.0% C
2.2% D
0.7% F

134 letter grades

Compare with the course
Rajabi vs. the course average
A +2.8
B −0.3
C −1.3
D +0.9
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

3.6% withdrew · 5 of 139 enrolled.

Christopher Charles Barnes 48 grades · 1 term 3.36GPA
66.7% A
20.8% B
6.3% C
0.0% D
6.3% F

48 letter grades

Compare with the course
Barnes vs. the course average
A −2.2
B +1.1
C −1.0
D −1.4
F +3.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 48 enrolled.

John Richard Stevens 39 grades · 1 term 3.34GPA
56.4% A
30.8% B
10.3% C
0.0% D
2.6% F

39 letter grades

Compare with the course
Stevens vs. the course average
A −12.4
B +11.0
C +3.0
D −1.4
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 39 enrolled.

Anna Colleen Turner 30 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
53.3% A
20.0% B
13.3% C
3.3% D
10.0% F

30 letter grades

Compare with the course
Turner vs. the course average
A −15.5
B +0.3
C +6.1
D +1.9
F +7.2

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 1 of 31 enrolled.

Cassandra Dana 12 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.70
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.75
Reflection4.70
Respect4.80
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.90
Danielle Soibelman 26 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5

26 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.77
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.83
Reflection4.80
Respect4.93
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.97
Darija Medic 5 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.60
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.10
Grading3.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.85
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.85
Questions4.85
Ryan Ernstes 23 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

23 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.65
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.55
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.45
Questions4.80
Muhammad Ali 14 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.70
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.55
Reflection4.75
Respect4.85
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.55
Questions4.70
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.