Course record CLAS
CLAS 1061
The Rise and Fall of Ancient Rome
University of Colorado Boulder
791 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
Zachary Herz 298 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
298 letter grades
Compare with the course
Herz vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
+1.2
C
−5.8
D
−1.5
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.2% withdrew · 10 of 308 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
73 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.42
Collaboration3.58
Connection4.37
Contribution4.10
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.40
Reflection4.58
Respect4.88
Creativity4.45
Feedback3.74
Interaction4.71
Challenge4.57
Questions4.69
Tyler Andrew Denton 68 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
68 letter grades
Compare with the course
Denton vs. the course average
A
+11.5
B
−10.1
C
−1.0
D
−1.5
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 1 of 69 enrolled.
Overall4.47 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.10
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.70
Respect4.90
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Isabel Koster 120 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
120 letter grades
Compare with the course
Koster vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
−2.4
C
+1.8
D
−0.7
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 120 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration3.20
Connection4.30
Contribution3.90
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.80
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Edwin Tyler Lansford 305 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
305 letter grades
Compare with the course
Lansford vs. the course average
A
−10.2
B
+2.1
C
+5.2
D
+2.1
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 13 of 318 enrolled.
Overall4.09 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.79
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.64
Collaboration2.80
Connection3.67
Contribution3.45
Discussion4.08
Inclusivity3.92
Grading4.55
Reflection4.12
Respect4.37
Creativity3.31
Feedback3.85
Interaction4.25
Challenge4.00
Questions4.67
Katherine Jeanne Johnson 4 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Lukas Nicholson 7 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.25
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions5.00
Travis Rick Rupp 8 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration2.10
Connection4.07
Contribution3.44
Discussion2.74
Inclusivity4.29
Grading5.00
Reflection4.29
Respect5.00
Creativity4.29
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Samuel Louis Kindick 12 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration2.46
Connection4.17
Contribution3.69
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.52
Reflection4.53
Respect4.86
Creativity3.48
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.46
Questions4.91
Richard Frank Ciolek 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.50
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.50
Jacob Bennett Horton 4 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.85
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.35
Reflection5.00
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.