Course record CLAS

CLAS 1061

The Rise and Fall of Ancient Rome

University of Colorado Boulder

791 grades15 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2025
Flunk Score37/100
Below average

Professors 15 of 15

Zachary Herz 298 grades · 1 term 3.53GPA
63.4% A
31.9% B
4.0% C
0.0% D
0.7% F

298 letter grades

Compare with the course
Herz vs. the course average
A +7.3
B +1.2
C −5.8
D −1.5
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

3.2% withdrew · 10 of 308 enrolled.

Tyler Andrew Denton 68 grades · 1 term 3.50GPA
67.6% A
20.6% B
8.8% C
0.0% D
2.9% F

68 letter grades

Compare with the course
Denton vs. the course average
A +11.5
B −10.1
C −1.0
D −1.5
F +1.2

Difference in percentage points.

1.4% withdrew · 1 of 69 enrolled.

Isabel Koster 120 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
57.5% A
28.3% B
11.7% C
0.8% D
1.7% F

120 letter grades

Compare with the course
Koster vs. the course average
A +1.4
B −2.4
C +1.8
D −0.7
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 120 enrolled.

Edwin Tyler Lansford 305 grades · 1 term 3.13GPA
45.9% A
32.8% B
15.1% C
3.6% D
2.6% F

305 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lansford vs. the course average
A −10.2
B +2.1
C +5.2
D +2.1
F +0.9

Difference in percentage points.

4.1% withdrew · 13 of 318 enrolled.

Katherine Jeanne Johnson 4 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.30
Connection4.30
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.50
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.00
Questions4.30
Lukas Nicholson 7 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.25
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.75
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.45
Questions5.00
Travis Rick Rupp 8 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.29
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.29
Collaboration2.10
Connection4.07
Contribution3.44
Discussion2.74
Inclusivity4.29
Grading5.00
Reflection4.29
Respect5.00
Creativity4.29
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.99
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Samuel Louis Kindick 12 reported responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.38
Technology4.71
Synthesis4.06
Collaboration2.46
Connection4.17
Contribution3.69
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.52
Reflection4.53
Respect4.86
Creativity3.48
Feedback4.06
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.46
Questions4.91
Richard Frank Ciolek 5 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.50
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.50
Jacob Bennett Horton 4 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.65
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.85
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.35
Reflection5.00
Respect4.65
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.85
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Tyler Lansford 46 reported responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.41
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.43
Collaboration3.67
Connection4.29
Contribution3.94
Discussion4.48
Inclusivity4.46
Grading4.68
Reflection4.51
Respect4.58
Creativity3.94
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.42
Challenge4.44
Questions4.73
Alexander Tyska 8 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.45
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.15
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.25
Reflection4.30
Respect4.55
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.20
Questions4.45
Abby Neyhart 7 reported responses 4.52Eval / 5
Overall4.52 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.25
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.25
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.65
Reflection4.40
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.55
Questions4.65
Julius Konstantin Arnold 14 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.10
Contribution4.85
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.75
Reflection4.75
Respect4.75
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.35
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.75
Questions4.85
Louis Mainwaring Foster 8 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.25
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.25
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.