Course record BUSM
BUSM 2020
Principles of Accounting
University of Colorado Boulder
3,533 grades8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score15/100
Needs work
Richard C Parker 427 grades · 1 term 2.94GPA
427 letter grades
Compare with the course
Parker vs. the course average
A
+3.6
B
−0.3
C
−4.0
D
+1.8
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
0.9% withdrew · 4 of 431 enrolled.
Overall4.40 / 5
178 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.70
Contribution3.78
Discussion4.43
Inclusivity3.82
Grading4.69
Reflection4.48
Respect4.60
Creativity3.97
Feedback4.04
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.66
Questions4.74
Jeremiah Contreras 1,159 grades · 1 term 2.91GPA
1,159 letter grades
Compare with the course
Contreras vs. the course average
A
+0.4
B
+3.7
C
−3.8
D
−0.3
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.5% withdrew · 30 of 1,189 enrolled.
Overall4.32 / 5
479 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.72
Synthesis4.18
Collaboration3.44
Connection4.55
Contribution3.97
Discussion4.58
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.43
Reflection4.56
Respect4.75
Creativity4.32
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.41
Challenge4.64
Questions4.67
Nathan Thomas Marshall 403 grades · 1 term 2.80GPA
403 letter grades
Compare with the course
Marshall vs. the course average
A
−3.7
B
+5.8
C
−1.9
D
−0.6
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 3 of 406 enrolled.
Overall4.41 / 5
198 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.75
Contribution3.80
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.05
Grading4.60
Reflection4.55
Respect4.75
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.65
Questions4.65
Joshua Ryan Neil 1,263 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
1,263 letter grades
Compare with the course
Neil vs. the course average
A
−1.5
B
−2.5
C
+4.2
D
−0.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
3.9% withdrew · 51 of 1,314 enrolled.
Overall4.05 / 5
366 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.44
Technology4.78
Synthesis3.45
Collaboration2.71
Connection4.84
Contribution3.72
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity3.38
Grading4.15
Reflection4.60
Respect4.53
Creativity4.25
Feedback3.15
Interaction3.07
Challenge4.79
Questions3.91
Susan Mcmahon 281 grades · 1 term 2.79GPA
281 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mcmahon vs. the course average
A
+5.1
B
−12.0
C
+5.3
D
+0.1
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
1.4% withdrew · 4 of 285 enrolled.
Overall4.15 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.99
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration3.36
Connection4.33
Contribution3.54
Discussion4.16
Inclusivity3.33
Grading4.10
Reflection4.08
Respect4.51
Creativity3.99
Feedback3.49
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.32
Questions4.38
Jonathan L Rogers 346 reported responses 3.97Eval / 5
Overall3.97 / 5
346 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.77
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.67
Collaboration3.83
Connection4.42
Contribution3.33
Discussion4.06
Inclusivity3.36
Grading4.11
Reflection4.08
Respect4.40
Creativity3.65
Feedback3.14
Interaction4.33
Challenge4.28
Questions4.25
Kirsten Ortez 15 reported responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.50
Technology4.00
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.00
Contribution3.10
Discussion3.70
Inclusivity2.80
Grading4.20
Reflection3.40
Respect3.80
Creativity3.40
Feedback3.00
Interaction3.90
Challenge3.90
Questions3.80
Vera Garrard 30 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.63
Technology4.37
Synthesis3.30
Collaboration3.63
Connection4.17
Contribution3.30
Discussion4.17
Inclusivity3.20
Grading3.90
Reflection4.23
Respect4.53
Creativity3.37
Feedback2.80
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.07
Questions4.07
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.