Course record APPM
APPM 4720
Open Topics in Applied Mathematics
University of Colorado Boulder
160 grades11 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score75/100
StrongDavid Matthew Bortz 42 grades · 1 term 4.00GPA
42 letter grades
Compare with the course
Bortz vs. the course average
A
+7.5
B
−5.6
C
−1.9
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.3% withdrew · 1 of 43 enrolled.
Overall4.24 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.99
Collaboration4.99
Connection5.00
Contribution4.99
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection4.99
Respect5.00
Creativity4.99
Feedback3.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.99
Questions5.00
Maziar Raissi 94 grades · 1 term 3.85GPA
94 letter grades
Compare with the course
Raissi vs. the course average
A
−4.2
B
+2.9
C
+1.3
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
4.1% withdrew · 4 of 98 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration4.01
Connection4.75
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity3.63
Grading4.63
Reflection4.78
Respect4.69
Creativity4.74
Feedback3.70
Interaction4.67
Challenge4.71
Questions4.82
Daniel E Appelo 10 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
10 letter grades · Limited sample
9.1% withdrew · 1 of 11 enrolled.
Jesus Ivan Portilla 14 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.89GPA
14 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 14 enrolled.
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Grace Mcstravock 1 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Michael J. Stutzer 3 reported responses 3.04Eval / 5
Overall3.04 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology2.70
Synthesis3.00
Collaboration2.30
Connection4.00
Contribution3.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity2.00
Grading2.70
Reflection3.30
Respect3.70
Creativity3.00
Feedback2.70
Interaction2.70
Challenge3.30
Questions3.00
James H Curry 5 reported responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.76
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Daniel Gregory Brown 17 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.26
Connection5.00
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.81
Inclusivity3.64
Grading4.50
Reflection4.89
Respect4.71
Creativity4.93
Feedback4.57
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.78
Questions4.66
Stephen R Becker 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Manuel Bosco Lladser 1 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration1.00
Connection3.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity1.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction3.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.