Course record NS

NS 4320

Nutritional Biochemistry

Texas Tech University

1 section7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2007–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 7 of 7

Vijay Hegde 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.23GPA
47.0% A
37.0% B
10.0% C
4.0% D
2.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Shu Wang 16 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.37
Course assignments facilitated learning4.44
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.69
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
Jada Stevenson 27 median item responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.04
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course3.95
Vjay Hegde 15 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.74
Course assignments facilitated learning4.82
Opportunities to be successful in course4.72
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.83
Brent James Shriver 27 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

27 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.74
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.48
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.41
Julian Spallholz 32 median item responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5

32 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.33
Course assignments facilitated learning3.40
Opportunities to be successful in course3.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.79
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.30
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.15
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.64
Chad Paton 31 median item responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5

31 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.65
Course assignments facilitated learning3.90
Opportunities to be successful in course3.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.91
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.06
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.94
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.80
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.64
Course documents

Syllabi 7

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

4 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.