Course record MATH

MATH 2370

Elementary Analysis I

Texas Tech University

5 sections33 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score41/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 33

Aruna Roshan Adikari 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.84GPA
96.5% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
3.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jianna Davenport 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.35GPA
58.0% A
22.0% B
19.0% C
0.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Gangadhar Acharya 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.30GPA
30.0% A
70.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Patricia Schovanec 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.98GPA
36.0% A
34.0% B
23.0% C
7.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jennifer Bryson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.38GPA
23.6% A
30.3% B
22.5% C
10.1% D
13.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jo Anne Temple 30 median item responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.37
Opportunities to be successful in course4.37
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.52
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.70
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Cynthia A Martin 18 median item responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.06
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.17
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.53
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Kelli A Johnson 24 median item responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.50
Opportunities to be successful in course4.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.71
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.71
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.75
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.54
Jennifer Janiele Cravens 28 median item responses 1.89Eval / 5
Overall1.89 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized1.68
Course assignments facilitated learning1.59
Opportunities to be successful in course1.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content1.79
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content1.96
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives1.82
Marcia Berta Murray 26 median item responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.38
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course4.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.55
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.48
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.15
Show all 33 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 9

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

6 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.