Course record HDFS

HDFS 3350

Development in Cross-Cultural Perspective

Texas Tech University

4 sections22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 22

Satabdi Samtani 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.77GPA
77.0% A
23.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Miriam Mulsow 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.41GPA
52.7% A
37.6% B
9.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Felix Morgan 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.00GPA
14.0% A
73.0% B
13.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Nancy Trevino 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.74GPA
18.6% A
44.2% B
33.7% C
0.0% D
3.5% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Yingli Li 30 median item responses 3.67Eval / 5
Overall3.67 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.41
Opportunities to be successful in course3.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.94
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.63
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.98
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.13
Helyne Ingrid Frederick 35 median item responses 4.13Eval / 5
Overall4.13 / 5

35 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.06
Opportunities to be successful in course3.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.28
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.97
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.29
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.94
Ronda Eade 45 median item responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

45 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.76
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.78
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.76
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Sarah C Kulkofsky 33 median item responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.46
Course assignments facilitated learning4.55
Opportunities to be successful in course4.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.55
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Shu Yuan 8 median item responses 4.24Eval / 5
Overall4.24 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.22
Opportunities to be successful in course4.13
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.25
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.13
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.13
Paulina Velez Gomez 28 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

28 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.82
Course assignments facilitated learning4.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.86
Show all 22 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

2 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.