Course record CHE

CHE 1121

Chemical Engineering Seminar

Texas Tech University

3 sections9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2003–2019

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score5/100
Needs work

Professors 9 of 9

Brandon Weeks 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.65GPA
29.8% A
27.7% B
25.5% C
10.6% D
6.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Sanjoy Bhattacharia 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.45GPA
22.9% A
22.9% B
36.5% C
10.4% D
7.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Haoyu Zhao 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.24GPA
24.0% A
14.6% B
33.3% C
18.8% D
9.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Theodore Wiesner 48 median item responses 4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5

48 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.45
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.31
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.51
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.62
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.34
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.28
Harvinder Gill 29 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

29 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.07
Opportunities to be successful in course4.09
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.37
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.99
Nabila Shamim 35 median item responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

35 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.60
Course assignments facilitated learning3.23
Opportunities to be successful in course3.30
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.05
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.43
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.04
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.09
Zeina Khan 38 median item responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

38 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.83
Course assignments facilitated learning3.54
Opportunities to be successful in course3.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.73
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.43
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.40
Mark Vaughn 24 median item responses 3.27Eval / 5
Overall3.27 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.04
Course assignments facilitated learning3.55
Opportunities to be successful in course3.22
Sindee Simon 25 median item responses 3.09Eval / 5
Overall3.09 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.88
Course assignments facilitated learning3.42
Opportunities to be successful in course2.98
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.