Course record MATH
MATH 2802
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
11 sections4 professors
Grades: 2017–2019Evaluations: 2017–2019
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score5/100
Needs work
Mark Bolding 2 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Bolding vs. the course average
A
+14.5
B
−10.8
C
−1.0
D
−1.6
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Laura Eslava 3 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.13GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Eslava vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+14.8
C
−4.9
D
−1.1
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.16 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.57
Instructor clarity3.80
Course effectiveness3.97
Instructor enthusiasm4.57
Instructor helpfulness4.13
Instructor availability4.37
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness3.93
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Gregory Mayer 5 sections · 1 term · 2019 3.08GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2019
Compare with the course
Mayer vs. the course average
A
+0.7
B
−4.6
C
+1.9
D
+2.0
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.30 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.40
Instructor clarity4.08
Course effectiveness3.66
Instructor enthusiasm4.48
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.46
Instructor effectiveness4.28
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.96
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Anton Leykin 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 2.98GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.70 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability3.70
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.60
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.