Course record LMC
LMC 6325
Game Design and Analysis
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
10 sections6 professors
Grades: 2015–2025Evaluations: 2015–2018
Flunk Score66/100
StrongLaine Nooney 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2016 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Nooney vs. the course average
A
+17.5
B
−17.5
C
same
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall5.00 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.65
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Ian Bogost 4 sections · 4 terms · 2017–2020 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017–2020
Compare with the course
Bogost vs. the course average
A
−4.4
B
+4.4
C
same
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Fall 2020
Overall4.28 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.25
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Ryan Scheiding 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Robert Schweizer 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.89 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Brian Magerko 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall3.90 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability3.30
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Sarah Lozier 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall1.13 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned1.00
Instructor clarity1.00
Course effectiveness1.00
Instructor enthusiasm1.00
Instructor helpfulness1.00
Instructor availability2.00
Instructor communication1.00
Instructor effectiveness1.00
Instructor respectfulness1.00
Assignment measured knowledge1.00
Instructor stimulates interest1.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.