Course record LMC
LMC 3710
Principles of Interaction Design
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
24 sections10 professors
Grades: 2014–2025Evaluations: 2014–2024
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record
Noura Howell 7 sections · 7 terms · 2022–2025 3.99GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Howell vs. the course average
A
+16.5
B
−13.6
C
−1.9
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Spring 2025
Overall4.65 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity4.49
Course effectiveness4.44
Instructor enthusiasm4.74
Instructor helpfulness4.51
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.69
Instructor effectiveness4.76
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest4.39
Mariam Asad 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Asad vs. the course average
A
+7.2
B
−4.3
C
−1.9
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.55 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Heidi Biggs 2 sections · 2 terms · 2025 3.79GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Biggs vs. the course average
A
+10.0
B
−12.2
C
−1.9
D
+2.1
F
+2.0
Difference in percentage points.
Christopher Le Dantec 5 sections · 5 terms · 2017–2020 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2017–2020
Compare with the course
Dantec vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+7.7
C
+0.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Fall 2020
Overall4.53 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.16
Instructor clarity4.58
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.58
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.22
Instructor effectiveness4.66
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge4.34
Instructor stimulates interest4.34
Robert Schweizer 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2015 3.51GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2015
Compare with the course
Schweizer vs. the course average
A
−13.8
B
+5.7
C
+4.6
D
+2.1
F
+1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.83 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Eric Corbett 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2020 3.33GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Corbett vs. the course average
A
−34.0
B
+26.4
C
+5.8
D
−0.4
F
+2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.73 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.60
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Laura Levy 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.53 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Nassim Jafarinaimi 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.77GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.47 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Sara Milkes Espinosa 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall3.10 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity3.10
Course effectiveness3.60
Instructor enthusiasm3.10
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication2.60
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor respectfulness2.10
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Thomas Jenkins 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.72 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.