Course record LMC
LMC 3431
Technical Communication Approaches
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
112 sections16 professors
Grades: 2015–2025Evaluations: 2015–2024
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record
Joseph Weakland 2 sections · 1 term · 2016 3.99GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Weakland vs. the course average
A
+19.0
B
−17.0
C
−1.8
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.89 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.35
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness2.95
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness3.85
Instructor respectfulness4.35
Assignment measured knowledge3.15
Instructor stimulates interest2.80
Dorothea Coblentz 4 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2024 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2020–2024
Compare with the course
Coblentz vs. the course average
A
+16.7
B
−14.7
C
−1.8
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.78 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.65
Instructor clarity4.81
Course effectiveness4.79
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.81
Instructor availability4.81
Instructor communication4.81
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.81
Assignment measured knowledge4.61
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Halcyon Lawrence 7 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2016 3.96GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Lawrence vs. the course average
A
+17.1
B
−15.5
C
−1.8
D
same
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.59 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.71
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness3.84
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.51
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.59
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.26
Jonathan Shelley 3 sections · 1 term · 2019 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019
Compare with the course
Shelley vs. the course average
A
+13.3
B
−12.0
C
−1.1
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.83 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Michael Measel 2 sections · 1 term · 2023 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023
Compare with the course
Measel vs. the course average
A
+11.9
B
−9.9
C
−1.8
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.27 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity4.13
Course effectiveness4.13
Instructor enthusiasm4.44
Instructor helpfulness4.14
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.29
Instructor effectiveness4.38
Instructor respectfulness4.28
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest3.94
Andrew Nance 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Nance vs. the course average
A
+10.0
B
−8.0
C
−1.8
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Kathleen Schaag 6 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Schaag vs. the course average
A
+12.2
B
−12.5
C
+0.3
D
same
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.23
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.63
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest4.17
Kelly Fitzpatrick 13 sections · 6 terms · 2017–2018 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Fitzpatrick vs. the course average
A
+5.0
B
−5.0
C
+0.1
D
+0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Fall 2018
Overall4.69 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.96
Instructor clarity4.69
Course effectiveness4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.71
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.14
Instructor stimulates interest4.36
Liz Hutter 3 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2016 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Hutter vs. the course average
A
+3.5
B
−2.2
C
−1.1
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.59 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.73
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest4.23
Matthew Halm 17 sections · 7 terms · 2022–2025 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 17 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Halm vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
−1.5
C
−1.1
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2022Spring 2025
Overall4.04 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.71
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.08
Instructor enthusiasm3.68
Instructor helpfulness3.88
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication4.18
Instructor effectiveness4.31
Instructor respectfulness4.27
Assignment measured knowledge3.84
Instructor stimulates interest3.73
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.