Course record CHEM
CHEM 2211
Introduction to Quantitative Analysis
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
22 sections9 professors
Grades: 2010–2018Evaluations: 2012–2018
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score3/100
Needs work
Facundo Fernandez 6 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2016 3.09GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Fernandez vs. the course average
A
+4.7
B
−1.6
C
−3.5
D
+0.1
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2016
Overall4.17 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.12
Instructor clarity4.14
Course effectiveness4.24
Instructor enthusiasm4.48
Instructor helpfulness3.72
Instructor availability4.08
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.16
Instructor respectfulness4.40
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest4.14
Ronghu Wu 5 sections · 5 terms · 2014–2017 2.96GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2014–2017
Compare with the course
Wu vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+3.8
C
+2.9
D
−1.7
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2014Fall 2017
Overall4.27 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity3.68
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.12
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.26
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge4.38
Instructor stimulates interest3.88
Lawrence Bottomley 7 sections · 7 terms · 2010–2015 2.91GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2010–2015
Compare with the course
Bottomley vs. the course average
A
−5.6
B
+2.0
C
+2.0
D
+1.5
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2015
Overall4.77 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.72
Instructor clarity4.53
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Carrie Shepler 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.99 / 5
28 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Robert Braga 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.17GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall3.89 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.88
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm3.89
Instructor helpfulness3.91
Instructor availability3.91
Instructor communication3.98
Instructor effectiveness3.91
Instructor respectfulness4.01
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.62
Louis Lyon 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.11GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Jiri Janata 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.68GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall3.77 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity3.40
Course effectiveness4.49
Instructor enthusiasm4.32
Instructor helpfulness3.56
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication3.26
Instructor effectiveness3.66
Instructor respectfulness3.86
Assignment measured knowledge3.74
Instructor stimulates interest3.66
Mary Peek 4 reported responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.18
Course effectiveness4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.26
Instructor helpfulness3.81
Instructor availability3.84
Instructor communication4.06
Instructor effectiveness4.02
Instructor respectfulness4.24
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest3.75
Christy O'Mahony 4 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.44
Instructor clarity4.39
Course effectiveness4.39
Instructor enthusiasm4.56
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.36
Instructor communication4.46
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.