Course record BMED
BMED 2110
Conservation Principles in Biomedical Engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
17 sections10 professors
Grades: 2020–2025Evaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score33/100
Below averageJulia Babensee 4 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2024 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Babensee vs. the course average
A
+0.4
B
+3.6
C
−1.9
D
−1.0
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.58 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity2.93
Course effectiveness3.93
Instructor enthusiasm3.31
Instructor helpfulness3.36
Instructor availability4.12
Instructor communication3.74
Instructor effectiveness3.61
Instructor respectfulness4.08
Assignment measured knowledge3.57
Instructor stimulates interest3.46
Maysam Nezafati 11 sections · 11 terms · 2020–2025 3.58GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Nezafati vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
−1.3
C
+0.5
D
+0.1
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2020Fall 2025
Overall4.49 / 5
46 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.36
Course effectiveness4.18
Instructor enthusiasm4.67
Instructor helpfulness4.21
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.53
Instructor effectiveness4.61
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge3.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.21
Johannes Leisen 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Overall4.08 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity3.57
Course effectiveness3.99
Instructor enthusiasm4.44
Instructor helpfulness3.72
Instructor availability4.44
Instructor communication4.12
Instructor effectiveness4.14
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge3.46
Instructor stimulates interest3.81
Joseph Ledoux 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall4.57 / 5
83 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Francisco Robles Guerrero 79 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
79 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.38
Instructor helpfulness4.28
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.42
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Rodney Averett 82 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5
82 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.20
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.45
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.95
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Edward Botchwey 84 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5
84 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.82
Instructor clarity3.07
Course effectiveness3.86
Instructor enthusiasm3.74
Instructor helpfulness3.15
Instructor availability3.75
Instructor communication3.71
Instructor effectiveness3.65
Instructor respectfulness4.09
Assignment measured knowledge3.28
Instructor stimulates interest3.38
Athanasios Mantalaris 81 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity3.87
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.43
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.37
Instructor communication4.17
Instructor effectiveness4.18
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge3.47
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Kelly Cross 47 reported responses 2.57Eval / 5
Overall2.57 / 5
47 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.74
Instructor clarity1.56
Course effectiveness3.61
Instructor enthusiasm3.12
Instructor helpfulness1.76
Instructor availability3.08
Instructor communication3.17
Instructor effectiveness2.22
Instructor respectfulness3.07
Assignment measured knowledge3.03
Instructor stimulates interest2.56
Aniruddh Sarkar 81 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
81 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.45
Instructor clarity3.47
Course effectiveness3.40
Instructor enthusiasm3.48
Instructor helpfulness3.19
Instructor availability3.98
Instructor communication3.88
Instructor effectiveness3.73
Instructor respectfulness3.86
Assignment measured knowledge2.71
Instructor stimulates interest3.25
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.