Course record BMED

BMED 2110

Conservation Principles in Biomedical Engineering

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

17 sections10 professors
Grades: 2020–2025Evaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score33/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Julia Babensee 4 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2024 3.67GPA
70.5% A
26.0% B
3.5% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2024

Compare with the course
Babensee vs. the course average
A +0.4
B +3.6
C −1.9
D −1.0
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

Maysam Nezafati 11 sections · 11 terms · 2020–2025 3.58GPA
70.3% A
21.2% B
5.9% C
1.1% D
1.5% F

Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2020–2025

Compare with the course
Nezafati vs. the course average
A +0.3
B −1.3
C +0.5
D +0.1
F +0.4

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Summer 2020Fall 2025
Johannes Leisen 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.68GPA
77.3% A
16.5% B
4.1% C
1.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample

Joseph Ledoux 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.36GPA
57.4% A
28.7% B
8.5% C
4.3% D
1.1% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample

Francisco Robles Guerrero 79 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

79 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.38
Instructor helpfulness4.28
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.42
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Rodney Averett 82 reported responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

82 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.20
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.45
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.80
Instructor effectiveness3.95
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Edward Botchwey 84 reported responses 3.57Eval / 5
Overall3.57 / 5

84 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.82
Instructor clarity3.07
Course effectiveness3.86
Instructor enthusiasm3.74
Instructor helpfulness3.15
Instructor availability3.75
Instructor communication3.71
Instructor effectiveness3.65
Instructor respectfulness4.09
Assignment measured knowledge3.28
Instructor stimulates interest3.38
Athanasios Mantalaris 81 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

81 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.07
Instructor clarity3.87
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.43
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability4.37
Instructor communication4.17
Instructor effectiveness4.18
Instructor respectfulness4.47
Assignment measured knowledge3.47
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Kelly Cross 47 reported responses 2.57Eval / 5
Overall2.57 / 5

47 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.74
Instructor clarity1.56
Course effectiveness3.61
Instructor enthusiasm3.12
Instructor helpfulness1.76
Instructor availability3.08
Instructor communication3.17
Instructor effectiveness2.22
Instructor respectfulness3.07
Assignment measured knowledge3.03
Instructor stimulates interest2.56
Aniruddh Sarkar 81 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5

81 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.45
Instructor clarity3.47
Course effectiveness3.40
Instructor enthusiasm3.48
Instructor helpfulness3.19
Instructor availability3.98
Instructor communication3.88
Instructor effectiveness3.73
Instructor respectfulness3.86
Assignment measured knowledge2.71
Instructor stimulates interest3.25
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.