Professor record LING
Daniel Witness Chen
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable
Evaluations: 2022–2024
Flunk Score36/100
Below average
LING 2000 · Introduction to LinguisticsLING 2000 · all instructors & syllabi
Student evaluations
4.48 / 5
School avg. 4.36
42 reported responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Collaboration+0.36
Technology+0.26
Inclusivity+0.25
Questions+0.17
Interaction+0.11
Feedback+0.11
Grading+0.10
Discussion+0.10
Connection+0.07
Contribution+0.06
Reflection−0.02
Respect−0.03
Creativity−0.09
Challenge−0.15
Critical examination of evidence−0.23
Synthesis−0.25
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
CU-Boulder FCQ (16-dim, 1-5) · in LING 2000 · 36th percentile at the school · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical examination of evidence | 4.13 | 4.36 | −0.23 |
| Technology | 4.70 | 4.44 | +0.26 |
| Synthesis | 4.05 | 4.30 | −0.25 |
| Collaboration | 4.51 | 4.15 | +0.36 |
| Connection | 4.50 | 4.43 | +0.07 |
| Contribution | 4.32 | 4.26 | +0.06 |
| Discussion | 4.61 | 4.51 | +0.10 |
| Inclusivity | 4.42 | 4.17 | +0.25 |
| Grading | 4.40 | 4.30 | +0.10 |
| Reflection | 4.42 | 4.44 | −0.02 |
| Respect | 4.62 | 4.65 | −0.03 |
| Creativity | 4.22 | 4.31 | −0.09 |
| Feedback | 4.22 | 4.11 | +0.11 |
| Interaction | 4.66 | 4.55 | +0.11 |
| Challenge | 4.32 | 4.47 | −0.15 |
| Questions | 4.71 | 4.54 | +0.17 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.