Course record LING

LING 2000

Introduction to Linguistics

University of Colorado Boulder

852 grades22 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score50/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 22

Rachel Farrelly 656 grades · 1 term 3.49GPA
66.6% A
24.2% B
5.5% C
1.8% D
1.8% F

656 letter grades

Compare with the course
Farrelly vs. the course average
A +3.7
B −1.0
C −1.9
D −0.3
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.1% withdrew · 21 of 677 enrolled.

Rebecca Kogan Lee 91 grades · 1 term 3.25GPA
59.3% A
22.0% B
11.0% C
3.3% D
4.4% F

91 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A −3.6
B −3.3
C +3.6
D +1.2
F +2.0

Difference in percentage points.

1.1% withdrew · 1 of 92 enrolled.

Cecily J Duffield 105 grades · 1 term 3.09GPA
42.9% A
34.3% B
16.2% C
2.9% D
3.8% F

105 letter grades

Compare with the course
Duffield vs. the course average
A −20.1
B +9.1
C +8.8
D +0.7
F +1.5

Difference in percentage points.

3.7% withdrew · 4 of 109 enrolled.

Mary Maureen Kosse 39 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

39 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration3.86
Connection4.68
Contribution4.34
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.59
Reflection4.80
Respect4.94
Creativity4.24
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.66
Questions4.72
Ayden Marzelle Parish 5 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

5 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.00
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.20
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.80
Respect4.20
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.20
Questions4.60
Elizabeth Goodrich 37 reported responses 4.28Eval / 5
Overall4.28 / 5

37 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.21
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.05
Connection4.41
Contribution4.08
Discussion4.37
Inclusivity4.51
Grading4.23
Reflection4.58
Respect4.81
Creativity3.91
Feedback4.02
Interaction4.58
Challenge4.24
Questions4.55
Raichle Farrelly 398 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

398 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.87
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.38
Reflection4.79
Respect4.94
Creativity4.66
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.82
Questions4.84
Farron Mackenzie Straitz 68 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

68 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.60
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Daniel Witness Chen 42 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

42 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.05
Collaboration4.51
Connection4.50
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.40
Reflection4.42
Respect4.62
Creativity4.22
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.32
Questions4.71
Natalie Marie Grothues 22 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.65
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.75
Reflection4.95
Respect4.90
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.85
Questions4.80
Show all 22 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.