Professor record PHIL

Daniel Nathan

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable
Evaluations: 2005–2020

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

A reliable within-course grade or school-relative evaluation comparison is needed to score PHIL 5314.

PHIL 5314 · Contemporary AestheticsPHIL 5314 · all instructors & syllabi

Student evaluations

4.63 / 5 School avg. 4.35

12 median item responses

How the ratings compare

Compared with the school, highest difference first.

Opportunities to be successful in course+0.43
Course was organized+0.35
Course assignments facilitated learning+0.33
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content+0.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content+0.25
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives+0.20
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course+0.19
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills+0.17
Left: below school averageRight: above school average

0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.

View exact values

TTU HB2504 (8-item) · in PHIL 5314 · A signal, not a grade

Means on a 1–5 scale. Response totals above describe the combined record, not each question.
QuestionRecordSchoolDifference
Course was organized4.664.31+0.35
Course assignments facilitated learning4.684.34+0.33
Opportunities to be successful in course4.704.26+0.43
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.574.40+0.17
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.714.46+0.25
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.674.35+0.31
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.654.46+0.19
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.434.23+0.20
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.