Professor record
James R. Durham
Grade distribution unavailable
Evaluations: 2019–2020
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataA reliable within-course grade or school-relative evaluation comparison is needed to score EDIT 3318.
EDIT 3318 · Applications of Technology in EducationEDIT 3318 · all instructors & syllabi
Student evaluations
4.78 / 5
School avg. 4.35
19 median item responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Opportunities to be successful in course+0.62
Course was organized+0.54
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives+0.54
Course assignments facilitated learning+0.47
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content+0.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course+0.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills+0.28
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content+0.21
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
TTU HB2504 (8-item) · in EDIT 3318 · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course was organized | 4.85 | 4.31 | +0.54 |
| Course assignments facilitated learning | 4.82 | 4.34 | +0.47 |
| Opportunities to be successful in course | 4.88 | 4.26 | +0.62 |
| Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills | 4.68 | 4.40 | +0.28 |
| Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content | 4.67 | 4.46 | +0.21 |
| Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content | 4.74 | 4.35 | +0.38 |
| Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course | 4.82 | 4.46 | +0.36 |
| Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives | 4.76 | 4.23 | +0.54 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.