Professor record
Don W. Bundock
Grade distribution unavailable
Evaluations: 2021–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataA reliable within-course grade or school-relative evaluation comparison is needed to score CONE 2200.
CONE 2200 · Construction Methods and DrawingsCONE 2200 · all instructors & syllabi
Student evaluations
3.55 / 5
School avg. 4.35
14 median item responses
How the ratings compare
Compared with the school, highest difference first.
Opportunities to be successful in course−0.19
Course assignments facilitated learning−0.37
Course was organized−0.55
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content−0.90
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course−1.04
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives−1.08
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills−1.12
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content−1.20
Left: below school averageRight: above school average
0 = school average for each question. +0.50 means half a point above it on the 1–5 rating scale.
View exact values
TTU HB2504 (8-item) · in CONE 2200 · A signal, not a grade
| Question | Record | School | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course was organized | 3.77 | 4.31 | −0.55 |
| Course assignments facilitated learning | 3.97 | 4.34 | −0.37 |
| Opportunities to be successful in course | 4.07 | 4.26 | −0.19 |
| Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills | 3.29 | 4.40 | −1.12 |
| Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content | 3.56 | 4.46 | −0.90 |
| Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content | 3.15 | 4.35 | −1.20 |
| Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course | 3.42 | 4.46 | −1.04 |
| Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives | 3.15 | 4.23 | −1.08 |
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.