Course record CNSR SCI

CNSR SCI 635

— ESTATE PLANNING FOR FINANCIAL PLANNERS

University of Wisconsin-Madison

936 grades26 sections8 professors
Grades: 2014–2025
Flunk Score13/100
Needs work

Professors 8 of 8

Chen Xu 39 grades · 1 term · 2025 3.65GPA
69.2% A
28.2% B
2.6% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

39 letter grades · 1 section · 2025

Compare with the course
Xu vs. the course average
A +25.0
B −16.0
C −7.6
D −1.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Heather Willborn 87 grades · 2 terms · 2017–2018 3.40GPA
48.3% A
46.0% B
4.6% C
1.1% D
0.0% F

87 letter grades · 2 sections · 2017–2018

Compare with the course
Willborn vs. the course average
A +4.0
B +1.7
C −5.6
D same
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Nathan Kublank 77 grades · 2 terms · 2016–2025 3.36GPA
45.5% A
46.8% B
7.8% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

77 letter grades · 2 sections · 2016–2025

Compare with the course
Kublank vs. the course average
A +1.2
B +2.5
C −2.4
D −1.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Lisa Andrews 470 grades · 9 terms · 2018–2024 3.34GPA
48.3% A
40.2% B
10.2% C
1.1% D
0.2% F

470 letter grades · 13 sections · 2018–2024

Compare with the course
Andrews vs. the course average
A +4.1
B −4.0
C +0.1
D −0.1
F same

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Spring 2024
Robert Mccalla 79 grades · 2 terms · 2014–2015 3.23GPA
36.7% A
50.6% B
12.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

79 letter grades · 2 sections · 2014–2015

Compare with the course
Mccalla vs. the course average
A −7.5
B +6.4
C +2.5
D −1.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Timothy Sugar 73 grades · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.08GPA
31.5% A
50.7% B
13.7% C
4.1% D
0.0% F

73 letter grades · 3 sections · 2023–2025

Compare with the course
Sugar vs. the course average
A −12.7
B +6.5
C +3.5
D +2.9
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Neil Dinndorf 45 grades · 1 term · 2016 3.07GPA
28.9% A
48.9% B
22.2% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

45 letter grades · 1 section · 2016

Compare with the course
Dinndorf vs. the course average
A −15.3
B +4.7
C +12.1
D −1.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

Dominik Piehlmaier 66 grades · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.05GPA
27.3% A
59.1% B
9.1% C
3.0% D
1.5% F

66 letter grades · 2 sections · 2016–2017

Compare with the course
Piehlmaier vs. the course average
A −17.0
B +14.9
C −1.1
D +1.9
F +1.3

Difference in percentage points.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.