Course record WRTG
WRTG 3040
Writing on Business and Society
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable19 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong
Sarah M Massey-Warren 121 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
121 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.91
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.40
Reflection4.77
Respect4.82
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.80
Questions4.81
Tobin D Von Der Nuell 22 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Sigman Mercer Byrd 125 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
125 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.64
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.50
Reflection4.51
Respect4.53
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.54
Questions4.64
Allison Gail Carr 11 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.90
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.99
Reflection4.88
Respect4.67
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.65
Questions4.69
Mariko Turk 3 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Levente Szentkiralyi 21 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 17 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Peter James Kratzke 27 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.84
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.42
Reflection4.78
Respect4.45
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.91
Questions4.76
Andrea Feldman 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.98
Connection5.00
Contribution4.98
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.96
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Sally Edith Green 2 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.