Course record WRTG

WRTG 3040

Writing on Business and Society

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable19 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score67/100
Strong

Professors 19 of 19

Sarah M Massey-Warren 121 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

121 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.44
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.76
Connection4.91
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.82
Grading4.40
Reflection4.77
Respect4.82
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.86
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.80
Questions4.81
Tobin D Von Der Nuell 22 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.55
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.75
Questions4.75
Sigman Mercer Byrd 125 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5

125 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.43
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.64
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.14
Grading4.50
Reflection4.51
Respect4.53
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.54
Questions4.64
Allison Gail Carr 11 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.96
Collaboration3.96
Connection4.90
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.99
Reflection4.88
Respect4.67
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.96
Interaction4.57
Challenge4.65
Questions4.69
Mariko Turk 3 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading5.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Levente Szentkiralyi 21 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5

21 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.85
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 17 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.60
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.20
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.50
Questions4.60
Peter James Kratzke 27 reported responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.84
Collaboration4.34
Connection4.84
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.42
Reflection4.78
Respect4.45
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.91
Questions4.76
Andrea Feldman 3 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.98
Connection5.00
Contribution4.98
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.96
Reflection4.98
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.98
Questions5.00
Sally Edith Green 2 reported responses 4.92Eval / 5
Overall4.92 / 5

2 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.50
Questions5.00
Christina Marie Eisert 4 reported responses 3.91Eval / 5
Overall3.91 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration1.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.30
Discussion3.30
Inclusivity4.30
Grading3.00
Reflection4.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.30
Interaction2.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.30
Andrew Wilson 115 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

115 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.89
Contribution4.84
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.21
Grading4.66
Reflection4.78
Respect4.83
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.88
Questions4.91
Seth G Myers 47 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

47 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.67
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.93
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.87
Inclusivity4.37
Grading4.70
Reflection4.63
Respect4.80
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.73
Questions4.90
Marlene E Miyamoto 13 reported responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

13 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence1.20
Technology1.20
Synthesis1.21
Collaboration3.08
Connection1.22
Contribution3.07
Discussion2.15
Inclusivity1.20
Grading1.21
Reflection1.21
Respect2.15
Creativity3.10
Feedback1.21
Interaction3.09
Challenge1.20
Questions1.21
Paula Wenger 6 reported responses 3.86Eval / 5
Overall3.86 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.80
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.00
Connection3.70
Contribution3.50
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.80
Grading3.50
Reflection3.70
Respect4.50
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.50
Challenge3.80
Questions3.80
Jennifer Grace Stewart 20 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

20 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.53
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.53
Inclusivity4.17
Grading4.70
Reflection4.37
Respect4.83
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.33
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.47
Questions4.53
Riley Bartlett 11 reported responses 4.03Eval / 5
Overall4.03 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.65
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection3.60
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.45
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity3.95
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.45
Questions3.95
Joseph Schicke 1 reported responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect4.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge3.00
Questions3.00
Ali Meyung 16 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.80
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions5.00
Show fewer
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.