Course record WRTG
WRTG 3035
Technical Communication and Design
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable19 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 160 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
160 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.78
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.34
Reflection4.49
Respect4.79
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.66
Questions4.84
Michael Andrew Szuberla 36 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.40
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.34
Inclusivity4.48
Grading3.48
Reflection4.07
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.12
Questions4.46
Levente Szentkiralyi 18 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Rolf P Norgaard 107 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
107 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.98
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.54
Reflection4.89
Respect4.95
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.89
Questions4.90
Matthew S Henningsen 21 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.62
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.32
Reflection4.48
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.55
Questions4.82
Peter Schaberg 16 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.77
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.63
Grading3.69
Reflection4.40
Respect4.95
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.70
Questions4.75
Alexander S Fobes 253 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
253 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology3.98
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.36
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.91
Reflection4.35
Respect4.38
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.30
Questions4.53
Justin Atwell 14 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.42
Reflection4.68
Respect4.92
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.71
Questions4.85
Petger J Schaberg 138 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
138 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.51
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.35
Reflection4.21
Respect4.43
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.22
Questions4.34
Paula Wenger 40 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.11
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.31
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.13
Reflection4.31
Respect4.57
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.29
Questions4.54
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.