Course record WRTG
WRTG 3035
Technical Communication and Design
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable19 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score51/100
Mixed record
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 160 reported responses 4.49Eval / 5
Overall4.49 / 5
160 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.56
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.78
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.19
Grading4.34
Reflection4.49
Respect4.79
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.73
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.66
Questions4.84
Michael Andrew Szuberla 36 reported responses 4.23Eval / 5
Overall4.23 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.13
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.40
Contribution4.37
Discussion4.34
Inclusivity4.48
Grading3.48
Reflection4.07
Respect4.60
Creativity4.15
Feedback3.83
Interaction4.39
Challenge4.12
Questions4.46
Levente Szentkiralyi 18 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.20
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.40
Questions4.70
Rolf P Norgaard 107 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
107 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.87
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.79
Connection4.98
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.96
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.54
Reflection4.89
Respect4.95
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.89
Questions4.90
Matthew S Henningsen 21 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.67
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.62
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.32
Reflection4.48
Respect5.00
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.55
Questions4.82
Peter Schaberg 16 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.54
Technology4.37
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.77
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.63
Grading3.69
Reflection4.40
Respect4.95
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.70
Questions4.75
Alexander S Fobes 253 reported responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5
253 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.26
Technology3.98
Synthesis4.31
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.36
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity3.95
Grading3.91
Reflection4.35
Respect4.38
Creativity4.42
Feedback4.23
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.30
Questions4.53
Justin Atwell 14 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.45
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.75
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.42
Grading4.42
Reflection4.68
Respect4.92
Creativity4.55
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.54
Challenge4.71
Questions4.85
Petger J Schaberg 138 reported responses 4.32Eval / 5
Overall4.32 / 5
138 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.26
Synthesis4.35
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.51
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.35
Reflection4.21
Respect4.43
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.11
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.22
Questions4.34
Paula Wenger 40 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.39
Technology4.11
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.86
Connection4.31
Contribution4.47
Discussion4.52
Inclusivity3.87
Grading4.13
Reflection4.31
Respect4.57
Creativity4.45
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.29
Questions4.54
Seth G Myers 15 reported responses 4.22Eval / 5
Overall4.22 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.30
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.50
Grading3.90
Reflection4.00
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.70
Questions4.90
Jason St James Lagapa 30 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.50
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.25
Grading4.50
Reflection4.40
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.75
Elizabeth Mary Stillwaggon Swan 59 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
59 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.66
Technology4.57
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.83
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.32
Reflection4.56
Respect4.63
Creativity4.61
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.65
Questions4.60
Nisha Shanmugaraj 18 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.90
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect4.60
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Elia Newsom 37 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.85
Connection4.85
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.65
Reflection4.80
Respect4.85
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.85
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Stephanie Lynne Couey 54 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.78
Collaboration4.88
Connection4.86
Contribution4.88
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.62
Reflection4.84
Respect4.86
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.78
Interaction4.94
Challenge4.74
Questions4.84
Dan Leamen 41 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
41 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.87
Synthesis4.76
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.91
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.75
Grading4.73
Reflection4.73
Respect4.88
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.83
Questions4.81
Scott Fredrick Holman 11 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.33
Technology4.33
Synthesis4.33
Collaboration4.87
Connection4.73
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.33
Reflection4.47
Respect4.60
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.13
Questions4.73
Riley Bartlett 14 reported responses 3.98Eval / 5
Overall3.98 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology3.90
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.40
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.70
Reflection3.90
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.40
Challenge3.40
Questions4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.