Course record WRTG
WRTG 3030
Writing on Science and Society
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable41 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score65/100
StrongJennifer Grace Stewart 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Levente Szentkiralyi 38 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.89
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.92
Reflection4.44
Respect4.74
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.94
Questions4.68
Sarah Nolan 77 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.90
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.96
Reflection4.79
Respect4.95
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.85
Questions4.93
Lonni Dee Pearce 110 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.51
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.94
Reflection4.70
Respect4.78
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.69
Questions4.77
Daniel Robert Long 145 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
145 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.75
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.76
Reflection4.68
Respect4.96
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.66
Questions4.85
Justin Atwell 67 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.81
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.82
Reflection4.84
Respect4.85
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.91
Questions4.96
Veronica Leigh House 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Jarad Robert Krywicki 242 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
242 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.80
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.46
Reflection4.66
Respect4.70
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.67
Questions4.72
Peter Schaberg 39 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.85
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.34
Grading3.50
Reflection4.37
Respect4.46
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.43
Questions4.65
Kurtis William Hessel 226 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
226 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.53
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.77
Reflection4.75
Respect4.89
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.75
Questions4.81
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.