Course record WRTG
WRTG 3030
Writing on Science and Society
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable41 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score65/100
Strong
Jennifer Grace Stewart 2 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Levente Szentkiralyi 38 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.97
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.53
Connection4.89
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.54
Grading4.92
Reflection4.44
Respect4.74
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.78
Challenge4.94
Questions4.68
Sarah Nolan 77 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.88
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.90
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.96
Reflection4.79
Respect4.95
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.91
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.85
Questions4.93
Lonni Dee Pearce 110 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
110 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.52
Technology4.92
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.10
Connection4.51
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.72
Inclusivity4.57
Grading4.94
Reflection4.70
Respect4.78
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.96
Challenge4.69
Questions4.77
Daniel Robert Long 145 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
145 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.82
Synthesis4.83
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.75
Contribution4.86
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.76
Reflection4.68
Respect4.96
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.66
Questions4.85
Justin Atwell 67 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
67 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.88
Technology4.91
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.81
Contribution4.97
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.77
Grading4.82
Reflection4.84
Respect4.85
Creativity4.86
Feedback4.82
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.91
Questions4.96
Veronica Leigh House 10 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.70
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Jarad Robert Krywicki 242 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
242 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.62
Collaboration4.44
Connection4.80
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.49
Grading4.46
Reflection4.66
Respect4.70
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.67
Questions4.72
Peter Schaberg 39 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.74
Technology4.55
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.85
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.34
Grading3.50
Reflection4.37
Respect4.46
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.43
Questions4.65
Kurtis William Hessel 226 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
226 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.77
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.53
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.77
Reflection4.75
Respect4.89
Creativity4.73
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.75
Questions4.81
Rolf P Norgaard 95 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
95 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.78
Connection4.86
Contribution4.77
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.78
Grading4.29
Reflection4.79
Respect4.93
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.77
Questions4.73
Sally Edith Green 8 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.98
Technology4.98
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration4.98
Connection4.98
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.53
Reflection5.00
Respect4.98
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.94
Questions5.00
Andrea Feldman 112 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.99
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.98
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.73
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.70
Reflection4.17
Respect4.60
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.99
Interaction4.20
Challenge4.60
Questions4.87
Dawn Colley 153 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.70
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.38
Grading4.42
Reflection4.72
Respect4.68
Creativity4.47
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.57
Questions4.58
Diane Debella 9 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.95
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.28
Connection4.72
Contribution4.72
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.55
Grading4.30
Reflection4.93
Respect5.00
Creativity4.18
Feedback4.23
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.39
Questions5.00
Rebecca Joanne Dickson 167 reported responses 4.64Eval / 5
Overall4.64 / 5
167 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.84
Technology4.51
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.89
Contribution4.82
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.76
Respect4.66
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.80
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.79
Questions4.86
Christina Marie Eisert 52 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.48
Technology4.52
Synthesis4.65
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.77
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.32
Inclusivity4.85
Grading4.63
Reflection4.40
Respect4.83
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.49
Interaction4.47
Challenge4.32
Questions4.53
Eric B Burger 90 reported responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5
90 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.46
Synthesis4.75
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.63
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.84
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.40
Reflection4.66
Respect4.87
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.74
Questions4.77
Steven Joseph Lamos 57 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
57 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.86
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.86
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.79
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.95
Inclusivity4.36
Grading4.85
Reflection4.85
Respect4.90
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.85
Questions4.95
Christine Elizabeth Brooks 11 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.60
Reflection5.00
Respect4.80
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions5.00
Matthew S Henningsen 153 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
153 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.55
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.04
Connection4.71
Contribution4.68
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.62
Grading4.71
Reflection4.44
Respect4.85
Creativity4.63
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.63
Questions4.71
Christopher Raymond Ostro 34 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
34 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.76
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.69
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.71
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.34
Grading4.34
Reflection4.63
Respect4.90
Creativity4.71
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.76
Questions4.92
Christine Brooks Macdonald 132 reported responses 4.70Eval / 5
Overall4.70 / 5
132 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.66
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.81
Connection4.43
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.18
Grading4.57
Reflection4.63
Respect4.84
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.67
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.61
Questions4.92
Petger J Schaberg 300 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
300 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.36
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.58
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.71
Inclusivity4.45
Grading3.80
Reflection4.52
Respect4.52
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.58
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.73
Questions4.69
Sarah M Barkin 39 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.76
Contribution4.81
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.76
Grading4.62
Reflection4.71
Respect4.85
Creativity4.81
Feedback4.76
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
J Harrison Carpenter 2 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration4.83
Connection4.08
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity3.75
Grading4.92
Reflection4.92
Respect5.00
Creativity4.83
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.92
Challenge4.92
Questions5.00
Chris Ostro 77 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.02
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.63
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.02
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.29
Reflection4.42
Respect4.66
Creativity4.64
Feedback4.01
Interaction4.66
Challenge4.64
Questions4.34
Elizabeth Mary Stillwaggon Swan 8 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.45
Technology3.95
Synthesis4.55
Collaboration4.65
Connection4.90
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.15
Grading4.05
Reflection4.15
Respect4.80
Creativity4.85
Feedback3.80
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.55
Questions4.85
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 15 reported responses 4.62Eval / 5
Overall4.62 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.80
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.90
Reflection4.30
Respect4.70
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Marlene E Miyamoto 93 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
93 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.49
Collaboration4.55
Connection4.70
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.31
Grading4.57
Reflection4.43
Respect4.79
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.73
Challenge4.64
Questions4.63
Adam Padgett 75 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
75 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.56
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.82
Connection4.58
Contribution4.78
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.43
Grading4.40
Reflection4.61
Respect4.91
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.36
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.45
Questions4.76
Elia Newsom 7 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.95
Collaboration4.88
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.95
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.95
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Lara Markward Hellie Jacobs 27 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.89
Collaboration4.59
Connection4.82
Contribution4.83
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.70
Reflection4.94
Respect4.87
Creativity4.92
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.77
Questions4.70
Joseph Schicke 31 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
31 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.56
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.37
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.41
Inclusivity4.08
Grading4.22
Reflection4.47
Respect4.66
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.29
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.37
Questions4.25
Kate Everson 5 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.80
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.20
Grading3.80
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Riley Bartlett 15 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.10
Reflection4.50
Respect4.90
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.40
Questions4.50
Dan Leamen 24 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.88
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.95
Grading4.78
Reflection4.90
Respect4.97
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.97
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.97
Questions4.97
John Joseph Daly 13 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.95
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration4.20
Connection4.95
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.45
Reflection4.75
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.95
Questions5.00
Natalie Rose Earnhart 1 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.00
Technology3.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect3.00
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.00
Questions3.00
Scott Benjamin Ritner 3 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.30
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.30
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.70
Jaquelin Pelzer 1 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.