Course record WRTG

WRTG 3007

Writing in the Visual Arts

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record

Professors 9 of 9

Alexander S Fobes 142 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5

142 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology3.99
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.16
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.54
Grading3.88
Reflection4.35
Respect4.47
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.23
Questions4.53
Kerry Anne Reilly 125 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

125 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.73
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.92
Reflection4.68
Respect4.91
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.63
Questions4.79
Anthony Abiragi 12 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.76
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.96
Reflection5.00
Respect4.97
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lara Markward Hellie Jacobs 30 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

30 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.11
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.42
Reflection4.67
Respect4.82
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.67
Jennifer Hope Knowlton 3 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

3 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Jason St James Lagapa 29 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5

29 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.45
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Marisa Tirado 9 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5

9 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.60
Reflection4.15
Respect4.25
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.00
Questions4.25
Natalie Rose Earnhart 1 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

1 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jason Shafer 4 reported responses 3.12Eval / 5
Overall3.12 / 5

4 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.20
Grading1.80
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback1.50
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.20
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.