Course record WRTG
WRTG 3007
Writing in the Visual Arts
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed recordAlexander S Fobes 142 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
142 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.22
Technology3.99
Synthesis4.47
Collaboration4.48
Connection4.16
Contribution4.32
Discussion4.59
Inclusivity4.54
Grading3.88
Reflection4.35
Respect4.47
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.23
Questions4.53
Kerry Anne Reilly 125 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5
125 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.32
Synthesis4.93
Collaboration4.41
Connection4.73
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.97
Inclusivity4.65
Grading3.92
Reflection4.68
Respect4.91
Creativity4.87
Feedback4.41
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.63
Questions4.79
Anthony Abiragi 12 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.99
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.76
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.96
Grading4.96
Reflection5.00
Respect4.97
Creativity4.82
Feedback4.98
Interaction4.98
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Lara Markward Hellie Jacobs 30 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.49
Technology4.49
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.11
Connection4.11
Contribution4.36
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.59
Grading4.42
Reflection4.67
Respect4.82
Creativity4.85
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.75
Challenge4.65
Questions4.67
Jennifer Hope Knowlton 3 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.70
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.30
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Jason St James Lagapa 29 reported responses 4.77Eval / 5
Overall4.77 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.45
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.85
Reflection4.65
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.65
Challenge4.90
Questions4.95
Marisa Tirado 9 reported responses 4.10Eval / 5
Overall4.10 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.20
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.25
Inclusivity4.35
Grading3.60
Reflection4.15
Respect4.25
Creativity4.35
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.35
Challenge4.00
Questions4.25
Natalie Rose Earnhart 1 reported responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Jason Shafer 4 reported responses 3.12Eval / 5
Overall3.12 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.20
Technology3.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.80
Connection3.50
Contribution4.00
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity3.20
Grading1.80
Reflection3.00
Respect4.00
Creativity4.20
Feedback1.50
Interaction4.20
Challenge3.20
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.