Course record WRTG
WRTG 2020
Introduction to Creative Nonfiction
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2021–2026
Flunk Score55/100
Mixed recordSigman Mercer Byrd 9 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.30
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.10
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.50
Jay Ellis 21 reported responses 3.28Eval / 5
Overall3.28 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.30
Technology3.00
Synthesis3.60
Collaboration4.50
Connection3.10
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity3.20
Grading2.50
Reflection2.91
Respect3.50
Creativity4.09
Feedback2.80
Interaction3.80
Challenge3.50
Questions3.50
Eric B Burger 13 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.83
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.94
Collaboration4.89
Connection4.89
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.87
Grading4.98
Reflection4.96
Respect4.87
Creativity4.98
Feedback4.89
Interaction4.98
Challenge4.80
Questions4.98
Tobin D Von Der Nuell 13 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.70
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity3.90
Grading4.80
Reflection4.80
Respect4.80
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.80
Kerry Anne Reilly 10 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.50
Connection4.50
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.70
Grading3.90
Reflection4.50
Respect4.70
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.80
Marisa Tirado 7 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.50
Reflection4.90
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Elia Newsom 14 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading5.00
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity5.00
Feedback4.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.90
Questions4.90
Andrew Wilson 10 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.70
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Catherine Kunce 8 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.80
Technology2.60
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.50
Contribution4.50
Discussion4.40
Inclusivity3.90
Grading2.40
Reflection4.40
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback3.60
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.90
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.