Course record WRTG
WRTG 1160
CMDI First-Year Writing and Rhetoric
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable13 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score71/100
StrongDamian Peter Doyle 112 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
112 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.56
Connection4.53
Contribution4.58
Discussion4.61
Inclusivity4.71
Grading4.34
Reflection4.57
Respect4.83
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.89
Challenge4.66
Questions4.54
Sarah M Barkin 145 reported responses 4.76Eval / 5
Overall4.76 / 5
145 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology4.83
Synthesis4.73
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.52
Contribution4.54
Discussion4.88
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.79
Reflection4.70
Respect4.87
Creativity4.72
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.79
Questions4.92
Nathan Dickman Pieplow 194 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
194 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology4.58
Synthesis4.59
Collaboration4.61
Connection4.57
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.69
Reflection4.65
Respect4.85
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.74
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.72
Questions4.85
Michelle Albert 151 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
151 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.71
Collaboration4.71
Connection4.67
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.79
Reflection4.68
Respect4.84
Creativity4.74
Feedback4.84
Interaction4.82
Challenge4.68
Questions4.94
Steven Joseph Lamos 38 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.75
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.88
Collaboration4.75
Connection4.70
Contribution4.65
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.61
Grading4.76
Reflection4.85
Respect4.89
Creativity4.79
Feedback4.95
Interaction4.99
Challenge4.94
Questions4.81
Lonni Dee Pearce 29 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.89
Technology4.24
Synthesis4.61
Collaboration4.40
Connection4.47
Contribution4.42
Discussion4.54
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.59
Reflection4.54
Respect4.87
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.71
Questions4.67
Alexis Deconing 4 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.80
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.80
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.50
Grading5.00
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.80
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Yukai Chen 18 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.15
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.05
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.10
Grading4.65
Reflection4.20
Respect4.85
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.45
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.15
Questions4.65
Orly M Hersh 51 reported responses 4.79Eval / 5
Overall4.79 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.68
Connection4.60
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.90
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.84
Reflection4.72
Respect4.95
Creativity4.89
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.76
Questions4.90
G Strauch 58 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.91
Technology4.69
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.81
Contribution4.71
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.79
Grading4.46
Reflection4.64
Respect4.74
Creativity4.77
Feedback4.71
Interaction4.85
Challenge4.69
Questions4.72
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.