Course record WRTG
WRTG 1100
Extended First-Year Writing and Rhetoric
University of Colorado Boulder
Grade distribution unavailable12 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record
Orly M Hersh 239 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
239 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.73
Technology4.73
Synthesis4.66
Collaboration4.57
Connection4.64
Contribution4.76
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.69
Reflection4.67
Respect4.87
Creativity4.75
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.63
Questions4.93
Young Kyung Min 139 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
139 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.11
Technology2.88
Synthesis4.11
Collaboration4.08
Connection4.27
Contribution4.21
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.09
Grading4.00
Reflection4.36
Respect4.26
Creativity4.06
Feedback4.22
Interaction4.34
Challenge3.76
Questions3.98
Christina Marie Eisert 17 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.30
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration3.85
Connection4.40
Contribution4.25
Discussion4.60
Inclusivity4.20
Grading4.50
Reflection4.35
Respect4.60
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.65
Interaction4.15
Challenge4.15
Questions4.85
Kerry Anne Reilly 9 reported responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.75
Synthesis4.85
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.85
Contribution5.00
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.85
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Damian Peter Doyle 88 reported responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5
88 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.43
Synthesis4.52
Collaboration4.67
Connection4.79
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.82
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.46
Reflection4.69
Respect4.83
Creativity4.68
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.75
Questions4.79
Mitchell Ingraham 14 reported responses 3.60Eval / 5
Overall3.60 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.45
Technology2.90
Synthesis3.40
Collaboration3.35
Connection3.50
Contribution3.95
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity3.65
Grading3.30
Reflection3.50
Respect4.35
Creativity2.80
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.85
Questions3.75
Sally Edith Green 58 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
58 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.64
Technology4.22
Synthesis4.48
Collaboration4.46
Connection4.48
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.68
Inclusivity4.48
Grading4.10
Reflection4.47
Respect4.54
Creativity4.48
Feedback4.79
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.64
Questions4.67
Peter James Kratzke 43 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.31
Technology3.27
Synthesis4.36
Collaboration3.78
Connection4.18
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.64
Inclusivity3.94
Grading4.34
Reflection4.39
Respect4.59
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.64
Interaction4.55
Challenge4.67
Questions4.59
Elia Newsom 54 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
54 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.93
Technology4.81
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.54
Connection4.61
Contribution4.75
Discussion4.91
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.93
Reflection4.91
Respect4.92
Creativity4.94
Feedback4.93
Interaction4.91
Challenge4.84
Questions4.95
Rebecca Joanne Dickson 43 reported responses 4.71Eval / 5
Overall4.71 / 5
43 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.65
Technology4.18
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.49
Connection4.69
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.39
Reflection4.67
Respect4.80
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.72
Interaction4.87
Challenge4.67
Questions4.77
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.