Course record STAT

STAT 4000

Statistical Methods and Application I

University of Colorado Boulder

390 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score42/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 10

Abel Iyasele 48 grades · 1 term 3.88GPA
95.8% A
2.1% B
2.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

48 letter grades

Compare with the course
Iyasele vs. the course average
A +31.2
B −21.0
C −7.4
D −0.8
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 48 enrolled.

Yermal Sujeet Bhat 25 grades · 1 term 3.52GPA
64.0% A
28.0% B
8.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

25 letter grades

Compare with the course
Bhat vs. the course average
A −0.6
B +4.9
C −1.5
D −0.8
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 25 enrolled.

Vanja Dukic 131 grades · 1 term 3.51GPA
71.0% A
17.6% B
8.4% C
0.8% D
2.3% F

131 letter grades

Compare with the course
Dukic vs. the course average
A +6.4
B −5.5
C −1.1
D same
F +0.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.2% withdrew · 3 of 134 enrolled.

Danielle Jeanette Lyles 53 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
58.5% A
28.3% B
9.4% C
1.9% D
1.9% F

53 letter grades

Compare with the course
Lyles vs. the course average
A −6.1
B +5.2
C −0.1
D +1.1
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 53 enrolled.

Francois Meyer 48 grades · 1 term 3.40GPA
56.3% A
33.3% B
10.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

48 letter grades

Compare with the course
Meyer vs. the course average
A −8.4
B +10.3
C +0.9
D −0.8
F −2.1

Difference in percentage points.

5.9% withdrew · 3 of 51 enrolled.

Matthew Paul Reichenbach 85 grades · 1 term 3.06GPA
45.9% A
32.9% B
15.3% C
1.2% D
4.7% F

85 letter grades

Compare with the course
Reichenbach vs. the course average
A −18.7
B +9.9
C +5.8
D +0.4
F +2.7

Difference in percentage points.

4.5% withdrew · 4 of 89 enrolled.

Matt Reichenbach 36 reported responses 4.51Eval / 5
Overall4.51 / 5

36 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.71
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration4.13
Connection4.66
Contribution4.63
Discussion4.79
Inclusivity4.65
Grading4.69
Reflection4.67
Respect4.78
Creativity4.51
Feedback4.39
Interaction4.72
Challenge4.74
Questions4.88
Kate Boden 11 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.40
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.60
Questions4.50
Rachel Suzanne Tutmaher 11 reported responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.50
Contribution4.20
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.60
Reflection4.30
Respect4.50
Creativity4.20
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.00
Challenge4.50
Questions4.30
Gavriil Shchedrin 8 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.60
Respect4.70
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.50
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.60
Questions4.90
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.