Course record STAT

STAT 3100

Applied Probability

University of Colorado Boulder

Grade distribution unavailable9 professors
Evaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score12/100
Needs work

Professors 9 of 9

Manuel Bosco Lladser 28 reported responses 3.87Eval / 5
Overall3.87 / 5

28 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.68
Technology4.03
Synthesis4.01
Collaboration2.76
Connection4.03
Contribution3.34
Discussion4.29
Inclusivity2.56
Grading3.80
Reflection3.99
Respect3.86
Creativity4.16
Feedback3.72
Interaction3.81
Challenge4.17
Questions3.84
Judith Law 43 reported responses 3.47Eval / 5
Overall3.47 / 5

43 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.66
Technology3.06
Synthesis3.57
Collaboration2.01
Connection3.93
Contribution3.41
Discussion3.81
Inclusivity2.16
Grading2.80
Reflection3.48
Respect4.51
Creativity3.49
Feedback2.96
Interaction3.84
Challenge3.59
Questions3.32
Subekshya Bidari 7 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.25
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.50
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.35
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.65
Feedback4.05
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.40
Questions4.25
Juan G Restrepo 7 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.35
Technology4.35
Synthesis4.50
Collaboration4.15
Connection4.50
Contribution4.05
Discussion4.15
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.25
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity4.75
Feedback3.75
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.75
Questions4.60
Nicolas Coloma Carphio 11 reported responses 3.72Eval / 5
Overall3.72 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology4.05
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration2.80
Connection4.00
Contribution3.55
Discussion3.95
Inclusivity2.75
Grading3.40
Reflection4.10
Respect3.75
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.15
Interaction4.15
Challenge3.25
Questions3.90
Yermal Sujeet Bhat 22 reported responses 4.11Eval / 5
Overall4.11 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.03
Technology4.39
Synthesis3.93
Collaboration2.83
Connection4.18
Contribution3.68
Discussion4.13
Inclusivity3.15
Grading3.39
Reflection4.30
Respect4.43
Creativity3.50
Feedback3.55
Interaction4.19
Challenge4.32
Questions4.58
Evan David Gorman 6 reported responses 4.36Eval / 5
Overall4.36 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.20
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.20
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity3.00
Grading4.00
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.00
Feedback4.00
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.70
Questions4.70
Brian Ha 7 reported responses 3.54Eval / 5
Overall3.54 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.90
Technology3.75
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration2.50
Connection4.05
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity2.90
Grading3.00
Reflection4.15
Respect3.75
Creativity3.00
Feedback3.00
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Yu-Jui Huang 12 reported responses 4.12Eval / 5
Overall4.12 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.25
Technology4.15
Synthesis3.85
Collaboration3.00
Connection3.70
Contribution3.80
Discussion3.85
Inclusivity3.60
Grading4.40
Reflection4.05
Respect4.50
Creativity4.05
Feedback4.05
Interaction4.05
Challenge4.40
Questions4.85
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.