Course record SPAN
SPAN 3002
Advanced Spanish Conversation
University of Colorado Boulder
353 grades10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score62/100
StrongYohainna Abdala Mesa 33 grades · 1 term 3.78GPA
33 letter grades
Compare with the course
Mesa vs. the course average
A
+8.2
B
−9.5
C
+1.6
D
−0.3
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
5.7% withdrew · 2 of 35 enrolled.
Overall4.37 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.20
Technology3.60
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.40
Contribution4.50
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.30
Reflection3.80
Respect4.50
Creativity3.80
Feedback3.40
Interaction4.80
Challenge3.90
Questions3.50
Vivian Elmore 136 grades · 1 term 3.61GPA
136 letter grades
Compare with the course
Elmore vs. the course average
A
−1.6
B
+2.6
C
−0.7
D
−0.3
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
0.7% withdrew · 1 of 137 enrolled.
Overall4.42 / 5
99 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.58
Technology3.97
Synthesis4.28
Collaboration4.72
Connection4.73
Contribution4.79
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.75
Grading3.98
Reflection4.54
Respect4.78
Creativity4.38
Feedback4.19
Interaction4.83
Challenge4.57
Questions4.47
Maria Christina Piras 147 grades · 1 term 3.56GPA
147 letter grades
Compare with the course
Piras vs. the course average
A
−2.2
B
+1.9
C
−0.1
D
+0.4
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
1.3% withdrew · 2 of 149 enrolled.
Overall4.35 / 5
84 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.95
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.45
Reflection4.48
Respect4.56
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.74
Questions4.63
Mary K Long 17 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.95GPA
17 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 17 enrolled.
Overall4.67 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.08
Technology4.68
Synthesis4.44
Collaboration4.77
Connection4.92
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.77
Inclusivity4.39
Grading4.54
Reflection4.37
Respect4.90
Creativity4.46
Feedback4.13
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.44
Questions4.69
Margaret Herland 20 grades · 1 term · Limited sample 3.57GPA
20 letter grades · Limited sample
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 20 enrolled.
Overall4.75 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.90
Contribution4.90
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.40
Reflection4.70
Respect5.00
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions4.70
Maria Cristina Piras 84 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5
84 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.59
Technology4.15
Synthesis4.58
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.95
Contribution4.89
Discussion4.92
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.45
Reflection4.48
Respect4.56
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.47
Interaction4.76
Challenge4.74
Questions4.63
Nuria Silleras-Fernandez 7 reported responses 4.30Eval / 5
Overall4.30 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.70
Technology4.50
Synthesis3.90
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.00
Inclusivity4.40
Grading4.30
Reflection4.10
Respect4.70
Creativity3.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.20
Questions4.50
Tania A. Martuscelli 10 reported responses 4.74Eval / 5
Overall4.74 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.70
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.90
Contribution4.80
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.40
Reflection4.80
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.70
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.70
Questions4.90
Allison Lee Glover 21 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.80
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration4.90
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.90
Reflection4.80
Respect5.00
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.80
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
Karla Rosete Nunez 9 reported responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.10
Technology3.90
Synthesis4.10
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.30
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.40
Grading3.20
Reflection4.20
Respect4.40
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.90
Interaction5.00
Challenge4.30
Questions4.20
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.