Course record SOCY

SOCY 3201

Sociological Research Methods

University of Colorado Boulder

634 grades14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score43/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 14

Laura R Patterson 504 grades · 1 term 3.37GPA
57.1% A
30.6% B
9.5% C
2.0% D
0.8% F

504 letter grades

Compare with the course
Patterson vs. the course average
A +5.7
B −2.1
C −3.3
D −0.2
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

1.2% withdrew · 6 of 510 enrolled.

Lori Mae Hunter 130 grades · 1 term 2.90GPA
29.2% A
40.8% B
25.4% C
3.1% D
1.5% F

130 letter grades

Compare with the course
Hunter vs. the course average
A −22.2
B +8.1
C +12.6
D +0.9
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 130 enrolled.

Micah Anthony Pyles 40 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5

40 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.07
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.17
Collaboration4.73
Connection4.23
Contribution4.27
Discussion3.80
Inclusivity4.37
Grading3.63
Reflection4.03
Respect4.00
Creativity4.23
Feedback3.43
Interaction4.27
Challenge3.97
Questions3.97
Jeanne Kaufman 47 reported responses 4.94Eval / 5
Overall4.94 / 5

47 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.82
Technology4.86
Synthesis4.82
Collaboration4.84
Connection4.79
Contribution4.96
Discussion4.99
Inclusivity4.86
Grading4.99
Reflection4.77
Respect5.00
Creativity4.86
Feedback5.00
Interaction4.86
Challenge5.00
Questions4.99
Katherine Ann Craig 52 reported responses 4.66Eval / 5
Overall4.66 / 5

52 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.42
Technology4.78
Synthesis4.38
Collaboration4.80
Connection4.42
Contribution4.67
Discussion4.78
Inclusivity4.58
Grading4.78
Reflection4.35
Respect4.78
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.75
Interaction4.62
Challenge4.57
Questions4.83
Danni Aileen Lopez-Rogina 6 reported responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

6 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection4.70
Contribution4.70
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.20
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.20
Interaction4.80
Challenge4.80
Questions5.00
William Blade Wagner 27 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

27 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.63
Technology4.63
Synthesis4.77
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.63
Contribution4.93
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.63
Respect4.83
Creativity4.97
Feedback4.83
Interaction4.93
Challenge4.73
Questions4.87
Luke Michael Novack 46 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5

46 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.51
Technology4.42
Synthesis4.57
Collaboration4.63
Connection4.67
Contribution4.48
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.56
Grading4.26
Reflection4.48
Respect4.74
Creativity3.92
Feedback4.28
Interaction4.68
Challenge4.43
Questions4.60
Blade Wagner 22 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

22 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.77
Synthesis4.67
Collaboration5.00
Connection4.83
Contribution4.80
Discussion4.83
Inclusivity4.80
Grading4.80
Reflection4.83
Respect4.90
Creativity4.90
Feedback4.77
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.50
Questions4.93
Hanna Mcelduff 31 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5

31 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.57
Technology3.82
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.97
Connection4.45
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.85
Inclusivity4.66
Grading4.52
Reflection4.60
Respect4.97
Creativity4.91
Feedback3.95
Interaction4.97
Challenge4.29
Questions4.87
Show all 14 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.