Course record SOCY
SOCY 3161
Global Perspectives on Race and Ethnicity
University of Colorado Boulder
143 grades7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2023–2026
Flunk Score61/100
Strong
Laurent Cilia 96 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
96 letter grades
Compare with the course
Cilia vs. the course average
A
+2.9
B
−2.5
C
−0.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
2.0% withdrew · 2 of 98 enrolled.
Overall4.53 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.53
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.64
Connection4.97
Contribution4.61
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.89
Grading4.32
Reflection4.77
Respect4.74
Creativity4.56
Feedback4.27
Interaction4.63
Challenge4.67
Questions4.46
Molly Todd 47 grades · 1 term 3.65GPA
47 letter grades
Compare with the course
Todd vs. the course average
A
−6.0
B
+5.2
C
+0.8
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
6.0% withdrew · 3 of 50 enrolled.
Overall4.38 / 5
78 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.85
Technology4.89
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.88
Connection4.39
Contribution4.87
Discussion3.76
Inclusivity4.96
Grading3.18
Reflection4.80
Respect3.88
Creativity4.32
Feedback2.44
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.34
Questions4.28
Alena Gabrielson 52 reported responses 4.48Eval / 5
Overall4.48 / 5
52 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.79
Technology4.76
Synthesis4.70
Collaboration4.69
Connection4.89
Contribution4.51
Discussion4.65
Inclusivity4.81
Grading4.63
Reflection4.78
Respect4.85
Creativity4.67
Feedback4.63
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.56
Questions4.76
Eduardo Lievanos Medina 32 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.50
Technology4.50
Synthesis4.40
Collaboration4.60
Connection4.80
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.30
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.40
Feedback3.90
Interaction4.70
Challenge4.60
Questions4.30
Noor Toor 2 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology4.50
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration2.00
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.50
Reflection4.50
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions4.50
Grace M Nakajima 24 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.70
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.80
Respect4.70
Creativity4.50
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.60
Challenge4.40
Questions4.80
Ileana Morales 2 reported responses 3.56Eval / 5
Overall3.56 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis4.00
Collaboration4.00
Connection4.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion3.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading3.00
Reflection5.00
Respect3.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback2.00
Challenge4.00
Questions4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.