Course record SOCY
SOCY 3045
Sociology of Death and Dying
University of Colorado Boulder
719 grades9 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score36/100
Below average
Mary T Edwards-Capen 144 grades · 1 term 3.74GPA
144 letter grades
Compare with the course
Edwards-Capen vs. the course average
A
+33.7
B
−22.0
C
−8.6
D
−2.5
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
0.0% withdrew · 0 of 144 enrolled.
Overall4.65 / 5
77 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.72
Technology4.85
Synthesis4.72
Collaboration4.42
Connection4.92
Contribution4.92
Discussion4.94
Inclusivity4.69
Grading4.68
Reflection4.78
Respect4.91
Creativity4.62
Feedback4.62
Interaction4.84
Challenge4.79
Questions4.94
Liane G Pedersen-Gallegos 575 grades · 1 term 3.15GPA
575 letter grades
Compare with the course
Pedersen-Gallegos vs. the course average
A
−8.4
B
+5.5
C
+2.2
D
+0.6
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
1.2% withdrew · 7 of 582 enrolled.
Overall3.92 / 5
111 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence3.92
Technology3.64
Synthesis3.94
Collaboration3.21
Connection4.37
Contribution3.76
Discussion3.72
Inclusivity4.21
Grading3.78
Reflection4.29
Respect4.25
Creativity3.60
Feedback3.22
Interaction4.26
Challenge3.95
Questions4.29
Liane G P Gallegos 101 reported responses 4.14Eval / 5
Overall4.14 / 5
101 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.17
Synthesis4.08
Collaboration3.13
Connection4.57
Contribution4.44
Discussion4.39
Inclusivity4.63
Grading4.12
Reflection4.37
Respect4.69
Creativity4.30
Feedback3.63
Interaction4.23
Challenge4.18
Questions4.30
Zoe Lefkowitz 49 reported responses 4.06Eval / 5
Overall4.06 / 5
49 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.20
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.00
Connection4.40
Contribution4.40
Discussion3.90
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.00
Reflection4.50
Respect4.50
Creativity4.10
Feedback3.80
Interaction3.80
Challenge4.20
Questions4.20
Sara Veljic 44 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
44 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration3.60
Connection4.70
Contribution4.00
Discussion4.50
Inclusivity4.60
Grading4.60
Reflection4.50
Respect4.80
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.50
Challenge4.50
Questions4.80
Robert Scott 37 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.47
Technology4.40
Synthesis4.37
Collaboration3.73
Connection4.67
Contribution4.17
Discussion4.47
Inclusivity4.27
Grading4.27
Reflection4.63
Respect4.63
Creativity4.00
Feedback3.93
Interaction4.43
Challenge4.47
Questions4.53
Theresa Edwards-Capen 96 reported responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5
96 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.61
Technology4.96
Synthesis4.92
Collaboration4.07
Connection4.97
Contribution4.98
Discussion4.93
Inclusivity4.64
Grading4.91
Reflection4.95
Respect4.67
Creativity4.96
Feedback4.88
Interaction4.86
Challenge4.62
Questions4.97
Jay Grega 38 reported responses 4.72Eval / 5
Overall4.72 / 5
38 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration4.70
Connection5.00
Contribution4.90
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.80
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.90
Challenge4.60
Questions4.80
Sydney Nemetz 6 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence5.00
Technology5.00
Synthesis5.00
Collaboration4.20
Connection5.00
Contribution5.00
Discussion5.00
Inclusivity5.00
Grading5.00
Reflection5.00
Respect5.00
Creativity5.00
Feedback5.00
Interaction5.00
Challenge5.00
Questions5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.