Course record SOCY

SOCY 3001

Classical Theory

University of Colorado Boulder

763 grades13 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2020–2026
Flunk Score46/100
Mixed record

Professors 10 of 13

Mathieu Desan 182 grades · 1 term 3.45GPA
61.5% A
29.1% B
6.0% C
1.1% D
2.2% F

182 letter grades

Compare with the course
Desan vs. the course average
A +2.3
B +2.1
C −4.2
D −1.3
F +1.0

Difference in percentage points.

1.1% withdrew · 2 of 184 enrolled.

Leslie Jane Irvine 185 grades · 1 term 3.43GPA
68.6% A
17.8% B
5.9% C
7.0% D
0.5% F

185 letter grades

Compare with the course
Irvine vs. the course average
A +9.4
B −9.2
C −4.3
D +4.7
F −0.6

Difference in percentage points.

2.1% withdrew · 4 of 189 enrolled.

Michael Haffey 396 grades · 1 term 3.32GPA
53.8% A
30.3% B
14.1% C
0.8% D
1.0% F

396 letter grades

Compare with the course
Haffey vs. the course average
A −5.5
B +3.3
C +3.9
D −1.6
F −0.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.0% withdrew · 8 of 404 enrolled.

Robert Scott 66 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5

66 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.60
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.53
Collaboration4.33
Connection4.63
Contribution4.27
Discussion4.73
Inclusivity4.67
Grading4.60
Reflection4.70
Respect4.83
Creativity4.57
Feedback4.37
Interaction4.77
Challenge4.53
Questions4.80
Tracy Michelle Kirkland 64 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5

64 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.91
Collaboration4.35
Connection4.94
Contribution4.73
Discussion4.89
Inclusivity4.93
Grading4.67
Reflection4.88
Respect4.93
Creativity4.78
Feedback4.92
Interaction4.95
Challenge4.86
Questions4.90
Austin Fitzgerald 83 reported responses 4.39Eval / 5
Overall4.39 / 5

83 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology4.10
Synthesis4.60
Collaboration3.40
Connection4.90
Contribution4.60
Discussion4.70
Inclusivity5.00
Grading4.69
Reflection4.80
Respect4.50
Creativity4.30
Feedback4.60
Interaction4.30
Challenge4.30
Questions4.89
Ian Whalen 84 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

84 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.90
Technology4.90
Synthesis4.80
Collaboration3.69
Connection4.90
Contribution4.59
Discussion4.80
Inclusivity4.90
Grading4.60
Reflection4.90
Respect4.90
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.40
Interaction4.79
Challenge4.80
Questions4.90
Blade Wagner 131 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5

131 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.69
Technology4.54
Synthesis4.63
Collaboration4.21
Connection4.53
Contribution4.64
Discussion4.75
Inclusivity4.72
Grading4.62
Reflection4.73
Respect4.81
Creativity4.34
Feedback4.52
Interaction4.69
Challenge4.61
Questions4.79
Sal Lapuma 7 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

7 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.40
Technology4.60
Synthesis4.90
Collaboration3.70
Connection4.60
Contribution4.40
Discussion4.10
Inclusivity4.70
Grading4.70
Reflection4.70
Respect4.40
Creativity4.60
Feedback4.10
Interaction3.70
Challenge4.40
Questions4.90
Sophia Harris 12 reported responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Critical examination of evidence4.80
Technology3.80
Synthesis4.30
Collaboration2.70
Connection4.50
Contribution3.60
Discussion4.30
Inclusivity4.50
Grading4.50
Reflection4.60
Respect5.00
Creativity4.70
Feedback4.30
Interaction4.40
Challenge4.80
Questions4.60
Show all 13 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.